Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Explicit feedback and the management of uncerta...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering. / Kravitz, Ben; MacMartin, Douglas G.; Leedal, David et al.
In: Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 9, No. 4, 044006, 09.04.2014.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Kravitz, B, MacMartin, DG, Leedal, D, Rasch, PJ & Jarvis, AJ 2014, 'Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering', Environmental Research Letters, vol. 9, no. 4, 044006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044006

APA

Kravitz, B., MacMartin, D. G., Leedal, D., Rasch, P. J., & Jarvis, A. J. (2014). Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering. Environmental Research Letters, 9(4), Article 044006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044006

Vancouver

Kravitz B, MacMartin DG, Leedal D, Rasch PJ, Jarvis AJ. Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering. Environmental Research Letters. 2014 Apr 9;9(4):044006. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044006

Author

Kravitz, Ben ; MacMartin, Douglas G. ; Leedal, David et al. / Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering. In: Environmental Research Letters. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 4.

Bibtex

@article{a4afc422cba3423b84bba480d45735e4,
title = "Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering",
abstract = "Solar geoengineering has been proposed as a method of meeting climate objectives, such as reduced globally averaged surface temperatures. However, because of incomplete understanding of the effects of geoengineering on the climate system, its implementation would be in the presence of substantial uncertainties. In our study, we use two fully coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models: one in which the geoengineering strategy is designed, and one in which geoengineering is implemented (a real-world proxy). We show that regularly adjusting the amount of solar geoengineering in response to departures of the observed global mean climate state from the predetermined objective (sequential decision making; an explicit feedback approach) can manage uncertainties and result in achievement of the climate objective in both the design model and the real-world proxy. This approach results in substantially less error in meeting global climate objectives than using a predetermined time series of how much geoengineering to use, especially if the estimated sensitivity to geoengineering is inaccurate.",
author = "Ben Kravitz and MacMartin, {Douglas G.} and David Leedal and Rasch, {Philip J.} and Jarvis, {Andrew James}",
year = "2014",
month = apr,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044006",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Environmental Research Letters",
issn = "1748-9326",
publisher = "IOP Publishing Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering

AU - Kravitz, Ben

AU - MacMartin, Douglas G.

AU - Leedal, David

AU - Rasch, Philip J.

AU - Jarvis, Andrew James

PY - 2014/4/9

Y1 - 2014/4/9

N2 - Solar geoengineering has been proposed as a method of meeting climate objectives, such as reduced globally averaged surface temperatures. However, because of incomplete understanding of the effects of geoengineering on the climate system, its implementation would be in the presence of substantial uncertainties. In our study, we use two fully coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models: one in which the geoengineering strategy is designed, and one in which geoengineering is implemented (a real-world proxy). We show that regularly adjusting the amount of solar geoengineering in response to departures of the observed global mean climate state from the predetermined objective (sequential decision making; an explicit feedback approach) can manage uncertainties and result in achievement of the climate objective in both the design model and the real-world proxy. This approach results in substantially less error in meeting global climate objectives than using a predetermined time series of how much geoengineering to use, especially if the estimated sensitivity to geoengineering is inaccurate.

AB - Solar geoengineering has been proposed as a method of meeting climate objectives, such as reduced globally averaged surface temperatures. However, because of incomplete understanding of the effects of geoengineering on the climate system, its implementation would be in the presence of substantial uncertainties. In our study, we use two fully coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation models: one in which the geoengineering strategy is designed, and one in which geoengineering is implemented (a real-world proxy). We show that regularly adjusting the amount of solar geoengineering in response to departures of the observed global mean climate state from the predetermined objective (sequential decision making; an explicit feedback approach) can manage uncertainties and result in achievement of the climate objective in both the design model and the real-world proxy. This approach results in substantially less error in meeting global climate objectives than using a predetermined time series of how much geoengineering to use, especially if the estimated sensitivity to geoengineering is inaccurate.

U2 - 10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044006

DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044006

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

JO - Environmental Research Letters

JF - Environmental Research Letters

SN - 1748-9326

IS - 4

M1 - 044006

ER -