Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Exploiting usage to predict instantaneous app p...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Exploiting usage to predict instantaneous app popularity: Trend filters and retention rates

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Exploiting usage to predict instantaneous app popularity: Trend filters and retention rates. / Sigg, Stephan; Lagerspetz, Eemil; Peltonen, Ella et al.
In: ACM Transactions on the Web, Vol. 13, No. 2, 13, 02.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Sigg, S, Lagerspetz, E, Peltonen, E, Nurmi, PT & Tarkoma, S 2019, 'Exploiting usage to predict instantaneous app popularity: Trend filters and retention rates', ACM Transactions on the Web, vol. 13, no. 2, 13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3199677

APA

Sigg, S., Lagerspetz, E., Peltonen, E., Nurmi, P. T., & Tarkoma, S. (2019). Exploiting usage to predict instantaneous app popularity: Trend filters and retention rates. ACM Transactions on the Web, 13(2), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3199677

Vancouver

Sigg S, Lagerspetz E, Peltonen E, Nurmi PT, Tarkoma S. Exploiting usage to predict instantaneous app popularity: Trend filters and retention rates. ACM Transactions on the Web. 2019 Apr 2;13(2):13. doi: 10.1145/3199677

Author

Sigg, Stephan ; Lagerspetz, Eemil ; Peltonen, Ella et al. / Exploiting usage to predict instantaneous app popularity : Trend filters and retention rates. In: ACM Transactions on the Web. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{200a6f166d4a42df8328e5406ecc02cd,
title = "Exploiting usage to predict instantaneous app popularity: Trend filters and retention rates",
abstract = "Popularity of mobile apps is traditionally measured by metrics such as the number of downloads, installations, or user ratings. A problem with these measures is that they reflect usage only indirectly. Indeed, retention rates, i.e., the number of days users continue to interact with an installed app, have been suggested to predict successful app lifecycles. We conduct the first independent and large-scale study of retention rates and usage trends on a dataset of app-usage data from a community of 339,842 users and more than 213,667 apps. Our analysis shows that, on average, applications lose 65% of their users in the first week, while very popular applications (top 100) lose only 35%. It also reveals, however, that many applications have more complex usage behaviour patterns due to seasonality, marketing, or other factors. To capture such effects, we develop a novel app-usage trend measure which provides instantaneous information about the popularity of an application. Analysis of our data using this trend filter shows that roughly 40% of all apps never gain more than a handful of users (Marginal apps). Less than 0.1% of the remaining 60% are constantly popular (Dominant apps), 1% have a quick drain of usage after an initial steep rise (Expired apps), and 6% continuously rise in popularity (Hot apps). From these, we can distinguish, for instance, trendsetters from copycat apps. We conclude by demonstrating that usage behaviour trend information can be used to develop better mobile app recommendations.",
author = "Stephan Sigg and Eemil Lagerspetz and Ella Peltonen and Nurmi, {Petteri Tapio} and Sasu Tarkoma",
year = "2019",
month = apr,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1145/3199677",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "ACM Transactions on the Web",
issn = "1559-114X",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploiting usage to predict instantaneous app popularity

T2 - Trend filters and retention rates

AU - Sigg, Stephan

AU - Lagerspetz, Eemil

AU - Peltonen, Ella

AU - Nurmi, Petteri Tapio

AU - Tarkoma, Sasu

PY - 2019/4/2

Y1 - 2019/4/2

N2 - Popularity of mobile apps is traditionally measured by metrics such as the number of downloads, installations, or user ratings. A problem with these measures is that they reflect usage only indirectly. Indeed, retention rates, i.e., the number of days users continue to interact with an installed app, have been suggested to predict successful app lifecycles. We conduct the first independent and large-scale study of retention rates and usage trends on a dataset of app-usage data from a community of 339,842 users and more than 213,667 apps. Our analysis shows that, on average, applications lose 65% of their users in the first week, while very popular applications (top 100) lose only 35%. It also reveals, however, that many applications have more complex usage behaviour patterns due to seasonality, marketing, or other factors. To capture such effects, we develop a novel app-usage trend measure which provides instantaneous information about the popularity of an application. Analysis of our data using this trend filter shows that roughly 40% of all apps never gain more than a handful of users (Marginal apps). Less than 0.1% of the remaining 60% are constantly popular (Dominant apps), 1% have a quick drain of usage after an initial steep rise (Expired apps), and 6% continuously rise in popularity (Hot apps). From these, we can distinguish, for instance, trendsetters from copycat apps. We conclude by demonstrating that usage behaviour trend information can be used to develop better mobile app recommendations.

AB - Popularity of mobile apps is traditionally measured by metrics such as the number of downloads, installations, or user ratings. A problem with these measures is that they reflect usage only indirectly. Indeed, retention rates, i.e., the number of days users continue to interact with an installed app, have been suggested to predict successful app lifecycles. We conduct the first independent and large-scale study of retention rates and usage trends on a dataset of app-usage data from a community of 339,842 users and more than 213,667 apps. Our analysis shows that, on average, applications lose 65% of their users in the first week, while very popular applications (top 100) lose only 35%. It also reveals, however, that many applications have more complex usage behaviour patterns due to seasonality, marketing, or other factors. To capture such effects, we develop a novel app-usage trend measure which provides instantaneous information about the popularity of an application. Analysis of our data using this trend filter shows that roughly 40% of all apps never gain more than a handful of users (Marginal apps). Less than 0.1% of the remaining 60% are constantly popular (Dominant apps), 1% have a quick drain of usage after an initial steep rise (Expired apps), and 6% continuously rise in popularity (Hot apps). From these, we can distinguish, for instance, trendsetters from copycat apps. We conclude by demonstrating that usage behaviour trend information can be used to develop better mobile app recommendations.

U2 - 10.1145/3199677

DO - 10.1145/3199677

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

JO - ACM Transactions on the Web

JF - ACM Transactions on the Web

SN - 1559-114X

IS - 2

M1 - 13

ER -