Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Exploring Lie Frequency and Emotional Experienc...

Electronic data

  • Accepted_Manuscript

    Accepted author manuscript, 492 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Exploring Lie Frequency and Emotional Experiences of Deceptive Decision Making in Autistic Adults

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Exploring Lie Frequency and Emotional Experiences of Deceptive Decision Making in Autistic Adults. / Blackhurst, Tiegan; Warmelink, Lara; Roestorf, Amanda et al.
In: Autism, Vol. 29, No. 6, 01.06.2025, p. 1612-1626.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Blackhurst T, Warmelink L, Roestorf A, Hartley C. Exploring Lie Frequency and Emotional Experiences of Deceptive Decision Making in Autistic Adults. Autism. 2025 Jun 1;29(6):1612-1626. Epub 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1177/13623613251315892

Author

Bibtex

@article{6f554d00a0a048899415620317927d6a,
title = "Exploring Lie Frequency and Emotional Experiences of Deceptive Decision Making in Autistic Adults",
abstract = "Deception is a multi-faceted social behaviour that is pervasive in human communication. Due to differences in social communication and experiences, autistic and non-autistic adults may contrast in how they respond to situations that elicit deceptive decision-making. This study examined whether autistic and non-autistic adults differed in their general lie frequency, their inclination to produce different lie types, and their emotional experiences of lying. Fifty-eight non-autistic and fifty-six autistic university students matched on age and gender completed self-report measures of their general lying patterns, how often they lied in the past 24 hours, and whether they would lie across hypothetical scenarios with differing beneficiaries (self, other, group) and motivations (protective, beneficial). The groups did not significantly differ in their general lying behaviour or frequency of lies told over 24 hours. Yet, autistic adults indicated that they would be significantly less likely to lie in group scenarios and would experience increased difficulty, more guilt, and greater concerns about their believability when lying. These results advance theoretical understanding by suggesting that autistic adults{\textquoteright} deceptive decision-making may be context-dependent. Future research may benefit from examining autistic deception across numerous social situations as more general lie frequency measures may be insensitive to nuanced population differences. Lay Abstract: Lying, a universal social behaviour, is frequent in everyday communication. Due to differences in social communication and experiences, autistic and non-autistic adults may react differently in situations where they must decide whether to lie or tell the truth. We investigated whether autistic and non-autistic adults differ in their general lying behaviour (e.g. how often they lie) and their likelihood of lying in a range of hypothetical social scenarios with different motivations (why people lie – to benefit or protect) and orientations (who people lie for; themselves, other, a group). We also examined participants{\textquoteright} emotional experiences of lying and truth-telling. We found that autistic and non-autistic adults{\textquoteright} general lying frequencies and emotional experiences were similar. However, the social scenario responses revealed that autistic adults would be less likely to lie to benefit or protect a social group they are part of. Moreover, autistic adults indicated that they would find lying more difficult across all social scenarios, experience more guilt, and would be less confident that their lie would be believed. This research highlights how autistic adults{\textquoteright} lying may be context-dependent and considers how a reduction in the likelihood of lying for their social group could increase strain on autistic adults{\textquoteright} social relationships.",
keywords = "Lie Frequency, Emotion, Motivation, Orientation, Autism",
author = "Tiegan Blackhurst and Lara Warmelink and Amanda Roestorf and Calum Hartley",
year = "2025",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/13623613251315892",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1612--1626",
journal = "Autism",
issn = "1362-3613",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring Lie Frequency and Emotional Experiences of Deceptive Decision Making in Autistic Adults

AU - Blackhurst, Tiegan

AU - Warmelink, Lara

AU - Roestorf, Amanda

AU - Hartley, Calum

PY - 2025/6/1

Y1 - 2025/6/1

N2 - Deception is a multi-faceted social behaviour that is pervasive in human communication. Due to differences in social communication and experiences, autistic and non-autistic adults may contrast in how they respond to situations that elicit deceptive decision-making. This study examined whether autistic and non-autistic adults differed in their general lie frequency, their inclination to produce different lie types, and their emotional experiences of lying. Fifty-eight non-autistic and fifty-six autistic university students matched on age and gender completed self-report measures of their general lying patterns, how often they lied in the past 24 hours, and whether they would lie across hypothetical scenarios with differing beneficiaries (self, other, group) and motivations (protective, beneficial). The groups did not significantly differ in their general lying behaviour or frequency of lies told over 24 hours. Yet, autistic adults indicated that they would be significantly less likely to lie in group scenarios and would experience increased difficulty, more guilt, and greater concerns about their believability when lying. These results advance theoretical understanding by suggesting that autistic adults’ deceptive decision-making may be context-dependent. Future research may benefit from examining autistic deception across numerous social situations as more general lie frequency measures may be insensitive to nuanced population differences. Lay Abstract: Lying, a universal social behaviour, is frequent in everyday communication. Due to differences in social communication and experiences, autistic and non-autistic adults may react differently in situations where they must decide whether to lie or tell the truth. We investigated whether autistic and non-autistic adults differ in their general lying behaviour (e.g. how often they lie) and their likelihood of lying in a range of hypothetical social scenarios with different motivations (why people lie – to benefit or protect) and orientations (who people lie for; themselves, other, a group). We also examined participants’ emotional experiences of lying and truth-telling. We found that autistic and non-autistic adults’ general lying frequencies and emotional experiences were similar. However, the social scenario responses revealed that autistic adults would be less likely to lie to benefit or protect a social group they are part of. Moreover, autistic adults indicated that they would find lying more difficult across all social scenarios, experience more guilt, and would be less confident that their lie would be believed. This research highlights how autistic adults’ lying may be context-dependent and considers how a reduction in the likelihood of lying for their social group could increase strain on autistic adults’ social relationships.

AB - Deception is a multi-faceted social behaviour that is pervasive in human communication. Due to differences in social communication and experiences, autistic and non-autistic adults may contrast in how they respond to situations that elicit deceptive decision-making. This study examined whether autistic and non-autistic adults differed in their general lie frequency, their inclination to produce different lie types, and their emotional experiences of lying. Fifty-eight non-autistic and fifty-six autistic university students matched on age and gender completed self-report measures of their general lying patterns, how often they lied in the past 24 hours, and whether they would lie across hypothetical scenarios with differing beneficiaries (self, other, group) and motivations (protective, beneficial). The groups did not significantly differ in their general lying behaviour or frequency of lies told over 24 hours. Yet, autistic adults indicated that they would be significantly less likely to lie in group scenarios and would experience increased difficulty, more guilt, and greater concerns about their believability when lying. These results advance theoretical understanding by suggesting that autistic adults’ deceptive decision-making may be context-dependent. Future research may benefit from examining autistic deception across numerous social situations as more general lie frequency measures may be insensitive to nuanced population differences. Lay Abstract: Lying, a universal social behaviour, is frequent in everyday communication. Due to differences in social communication and experiences, autistic and non-autistic adults may react differently in situations where they must decide whether to lie or tell the truth. We investigated whether autistic and non-autistic adults differ in their general lying behaviour (e.g. how often they lie) and their likelihood of lying in a range of hypothetical social scenarios with different motivations (why people lie – to benefit or protect) and orientations (who people lie for; themselves, other, a group). We also examined participants’ emotional experiences of lying and truth-telling. We found that autistic and non-autistic adults’ general lying frequencies and emotional experiences were similar. However, the social scenario responses revealed that autistic adults would be less likely to lie to benefit or protect a social group they are part of. Moreover, autistic adults indicated that they would find lying more difficult across all social scenarios, experience more guilt, and would be less confident that their lie would be believed. This research highlights how autistic adults’ lying may be context-dependent and considers how a reduction in the likelihood of lying for their social group could increase strain on autistic adults’ social relationships.

KW - Lie Frequency

KW - Emotion

KW - Motivation

KW - Orientation

KW - Autism

U2 - 10.1177/13623613251315892

DO - 10.1177/13623613251315892

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 40033520

VL - 29

SP - 1612

EP - 1626

JO - Autism

JF - Autism

SN - 1362-3613

IS - 6

ER -