Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Exploring Predictors of First Appointment Atten...

Electronic data

  • BJP_19_0057.R3_Proof_hi_002_.pdf

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, British Journal of Pain, 14 (3), 2020, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the British Journal of Pain page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/bjpb on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 192 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Exploring Predictors of First Appointment Attendance at a Pain Management Service

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/08/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>British Journal of Pain
Issue number3
Volume14
Number of pages9
Pages (from-to)152-160
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date6/03/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Background:
Individual characteristics such as gender, employment and age have been shown to predict attendance at pain management services (PMS). The characteristics of those who drop out of pain management programmes have also been explored, but as yet no studies have analysed the characteristics of those who do not attend the service following referral.

Purpose:
To explore the characteristics and predictors of those who attend and those who do not attend their first appointment with a PMS.

Method:
Predictive factors in the two groups – attenders (n = 425) and non-attenders (n = 69) – were explored using logistic regression.

Results:
Non-attendance was significantly predicted by the patient being a smoker and the appointment being in the morning. Non-attenders also scored higher on the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, indicating higher levels of somatic pain.

Discussion:
Predictors of non-attendance were different from those for individuals who drop out of pain services. Implications and recommendations are made for PMS.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, British Journal of Pain, 14 (3), 2020, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the British Journal of Pain page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/bjpb on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/