Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Exploring the interaction between law and econo...
View graph of relations

Exploring the interaction between law and economics: The limits of formalism

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Exploring the interaction between law and economics: The limits of formalism. / Campbell, David; Picciotto, Sol.
In: Legal Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, 30.09.1998, p. 249-278.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Campbell D, Picciotto S. Exploring the interaction between law and economics: The limits of formalism. Legal Studies. 1998 Sept 30;18(3):249-278. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.1998.tb00017.x

Author

Campbell, David ; Picciotto, Sol. / Exploring the interaction between law and economics : The limits of formalism. In: Legal Studies. 1998 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 249-278.

Bibtex

@article{05f9f6bf05384b8abed5ceb1b0546d9b,
title = "Exploring the interaction between law and economics: The limits of formalism",
abstract = "As lawyers concerned with the regulation of economic activity, we applaud the recognition in Professor Charles Goodhart's recent Chorley lecture that much of the {\textquoteleft}law and economics{\textquoteright} of the past quarter-century has involved {\textquoteleft}too much one-way traffic{\textquoteright}. If the field of law and economics has indeed largely, as Professor Goodhart suggests, consisted of a process of intellectual imperialism, specifically of the colonisation of law by economics, we consider it important to reflect on the reasons for this, and to make some suggestions to improve the collaboration between the two disciplines. In brief, we suggest that this interaction has been bedevilled by its tendency to reproduce the worst aspects of formalism in each discipline.Professor Goodhart shows that the bulk of law and economics has consisted of a fairly unthinking application of standard neo-classical economic assumptions to legal phenomena which have themselves typically been conceived in conventional doctrinal terms.",
author = "David Campbell and Sol Picciotto",
year = "1998",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/j.1748-121X.1998.tb00017.x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "249--278",
journal = "Legal Studies",
issn = "0261-3875",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the interaction between law and economics

T2 - The limits of formalism

AU - Campbell, David

AU - Picciotto, Sol

PY - 1998/9/30

Y1 - 1998/9/30

N2 - As lawyers concerned with the regulation of economic activity, we applaud the recognition in Professor Charles Goodhart's recent Chorley lecture that much of the ‘law and economics’ of the past quarter-century has involved ‘too much one-way traffic’. If the field of law and economics has indeed largely, as Professor Goodhart suggests, consisted of a process of intellectual imperialism, specifically of the colonisation of law by economics, we consider it important to reflect on the reasons for this, and to make some suggestions to improve the collaboration between the two disciplines. In brief, we suggest that this interaction has been bedevilled by its tendency to reproduce the worst aspects of formalism in each discipline.Professor Goodhart shows that the bulk of law and economics has consisted of a fairly unthinking application of standard neo-classical economic assumptions to legal phenomena which have themselves typically been conceived in conventional doctrinal terms.

AB - As lawyers concerned with the regulation of economic activity, we applaud the recognition in Professor Charles Goodhart's recent Chorley lecture that much of the ‘law and economics’ of the past quarter-century has involved ‘too much one-way traffic’. If the field of law and economics has indeed largely, as Professor Goodhart suggests, consisted of a process of intellectual imperialism, specifically of the colonisation of law by economics, we consider it important to reflect on the reasons for this, and to make some suggestions to improve the collaboration between the two disciplines. In brief, we suggest that this interaction has been bedevilled by its tendency to reproduce the worst aspects of formalism in each discipline.Professor Goodhart shows that the bulk of law and economics has consisted of a fairly unthinking application of standard neo-classical economic assumptions to legal phenomena which have themselves typically been conceived in conventional doctrinal terms.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1748-121X.1998.tb00017.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1748-121X.1998.tb00017.x

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:1142301775

VL - 18

SP - 249

EP - 278

JO - Legal Studies

JF - Legal Studies

SN - 0261-3875

IS - 3

ER -