Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic...
View graph of relations

Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic metric: reflections and implications for practice

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic metric: reflections and implications for practice. / Jordan, Katy.
Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW’15), 30 June 2015, Oxford.. 2015.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Jordan K. Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic metric: reflections and implications for practice. In Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW’15), 30 June 2015, Oxford.. 2015

Author

Jordan, Katy. / Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic metric: reflections and implications for practice. Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW’15), 30 June 2015, Oxford.. 2015.

Bibtex

@inproceedings{9f560f76e5c44d41af88cf17330a6770,
title = "Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic metric: reflections and implications for practice",
abstract = "This paper presents a response to the paper {\textquoteleft}A critical look at the ResearchGate score as a measure of scientific reputation{\textquoteright}. Following up on arguments presented by the authors, which argue that the ResearchGate score is irreproducible and dependent upon Journal Impact Factors, a small-scale exploratory analysis of ResearchGate scores was undertaken to examine correlations between ResearchGate score and profile metrics. The importance of the Journal Impact Factor in determining ResearchGate score is confirmed, and insights gained into the relationship. A model which significantly predicts ResearchGate score is described. The findings are discussed in terms of the three arguments outlined in the original paper, and in relation to academic practice.",
author = "Katy Jordan",
year = "2015",
month = jun,
day = "22",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW{\textquoteright}15), 30 June 2015, Oxford.",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Exploring the ResearchGate score as an academic metric: reflections and implications for practice

AU - Jordan, Katy

PY - 2015/6/22

Y1 - 2015/6/22

N2 - This paper presents a response to the paper ‘A critical look at the ResearchGate score as a measure of scientific reputation’. Following up on arguments presented by the authors, which argue that the ResearchGate score is irreproducible and dependent upon Journal Impact Factors, a small-scale exploratory analysis of ResearchGate scores was undertaken to examine correlations between ResearchGate score and profile metrics. The importance of the Journal Impact Factor in determining ResearchGate score is confirmed, and insights gained into the relationship. A model which significantly predicts ResearchGate score is described. The findings are discussed in terms of the three arguments outlined in the original paper, and in relation to academic practice.

AB - This paper presents a response to the paper ‘A critical look at the ResearchGate score as a measure of scientific reputation’. Following up on arguments presented by the authors, which argue that the ResearchGate score is irreproducible and dependent upon Journal Impact Factors, a small-scale exploratory analysis of ResearchGate scores was undertaken to examine correlations between ResearchGate score and profile metrics. The importance of the Journal Impact Factor in determining ResearchGate score is confirmed, and insights gained into the relationship. A model which significantly predicts ResearchGate score is described. The findings are discussed in terms of the three arguments outlined in the original paper, and in relation to academic practice.

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

BT - Quantifying and Analysing Scholarly Communication on the Web (ASCW’15), 30 June 2015, Oxford.

ER -