Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Faculty Ideals and Universities Third Mission

Research

Associated organisational units

Electronic data

  • Third_Mission_resubmission_draft_June_2019_identifiers_removed

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.019

    Accepted author manuscript, 440 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Faculty Ideals and Universities Third Mission

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>31/10/2019
<mark>Journal</mark>Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume147
Number of pages12
Pages (from-to)10-21
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date12/07/19
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

There is considerable variety in academics' attitudes towards universities' third mission.
Research inactive faculty are more sympathetic to third mission goals than even applied research faculty.
Women and younger colleagues are more ambivalent about the third mission.
Faculty at universities that incentivise teaching tend towards a more positive attitude of the third mission.
Private sector experience associates with third mission proclivities, not-for-profit experience associates with opposition.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 2019 DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.019