Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Fahrenheit 9/11 : the temperature where moralit...

Research

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Fahrenheit 9/11 : the temperature where morality burns.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Fahrenheit 9/11 : the temperature where morality burns. / Weber, Cynthia.
In: Journal of American Studies, Vol. 40, No. 1, 04.2006, p. 113-131.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Weber, C 2006, 'Fahrenheit 9/11 : the temperature where morality burns.', Journal of American Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875806000776

APA

Weber, C. (2006). Fahrenheit 9/11 : the temperature where morality burns. Journal of American Studies, 40(1), 113-131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875806000776

Vancouver

Weber C. Fahrenheit 9/11 : the temperature where morality burns. Journal of American Studies. 2006 Apr;40(1):113-131. doi: 10.1017/S0021875806000776

Author

Weber, Cynthia. / Fahrenheit 9/11 : the temperature where morality burns. In: Journal of American Studies. 2006 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 113-131.

Bibtex

@article{6c904c90f3b7436cbfac150e46c9adac,
title = "Fahrenheit 9/11 : the temperature where morality burns.",
abstract = "Michael Moore's 2004 film Fahrenheit 9/11 is a visual and narrative tour de force that critiques everything from the controversial conditions under which George W. Bush assumed the US presidency to President Bush's handling of his so-called “war on terror.” With its tagline “The temperature where freedom burns,” Moore stresses the dubious ethical nature of the Bush administration's post-9/11 policies, especially as they redefine the US relationship between freedom and censorship. In so doing, he challenges the Bush administration's constructions of US morality as ultimately elitist and self-serving, substituting his own populist, class-based moral America(n) in its place.",
author = "Cynthia Weber",
note = "http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=AMS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of American Studies, 40 (1), pp 113-131 2006, {\textcopyright} 2006 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2006",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1017/S0021875806000776",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "113--131",
journal = "Journal of American Studies",
issn = "1469-5154",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fahrenheit 9/11 : the temperature where morality burns.

AU - Weber, Cynthia

N1 - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=AMS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of American Studies, 40 (1), pp 113-131 2006, © 2006 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Michael Moore's 2004 film Fahrenheit 9/11 is a visual and narrative tour de force that critiques everything from the controversial conditions under which George W. Bush assumed the US presidency to President Bush's handling of his so-called “war on terror.” With its tagline “The temperature where freedom burns,” Moore stresses the dubious ethical nature of the Bush administration's post-9/11 policies, especially as they redefine the US relationship between freedom and censorship. In so doing, he challenges the Bush administration's constructions of US morality as ultimately elitist and self-serving, substituting his own populist, class-based moral America(n) in its place.

AB - Michael Moore's 2004 film Fahrenheit 9/11 is a visual and narrative tour de force that critiques everything from the controversial conditions under which George W. Bush assumed the US presidency to President Bush's handling of his so-called “war on terror.” With its tagline “The temperature where freedom burns,” Moore stresses the dubious ethical nature of the Bush administration's post-9/11 policies, especially as they redefine the US relationship between freedom and censorship. In so doing, he challenges the Bush administration's constructions of US morality as ultimately elitist and self-serving, substituting his own populist, class-based moral America(n) in its place.

U2 - 10.1017/S0021875806000776

DO - 10.1017/S0021875806000776

M3 - Journal article

VL - 40

SP - 113

EP - 131

JO - Journal of American Studies

JF - Journal of American Studies

SN - 1469-5154

IS - 1

ER -