Rights statement: This is an Author’s Original Manuscript (AOM) of an article published by Bristol University Press in Global Discourse on 05 October 2020, available online: https://doi.org/10.1332/204378920X15989751152011.
Accepted author manuscript, 331 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Fairness, generosity and conditionality in the welfare system
T2 - the case of UK disability benefits
AU - Johnson, Elliott
AU - Nettle, Daniel
N1 - This is an Author’s Original Manuscript (AOM) of an article published by Bristol University Press in Global Discourse on 05 October 2020, available online: https://doi.org/10.1332/204378920X15989751152011.
PY - 2020/10/5
Y1 - 2020/10/5
N2 - This paper represents a collaboration between a policy researcher and a behavioural scientist who studies cooperation. Our goal was to develop a shared understanding of one particular policy topic, the reforms to the UK system of disability benefits initiated during the last term of the New Labour Government and accelerated under the Conservative-led administrations since 2010. These reforms introduced much stronger focus on conditionality and assessment, aiming to reduce the cost of the benefit by identifying and removing ‘cheaters’ or ‘undeserving’ recipients from the system. The reforms have failed by even their own stated goals. Here, we seek to understand why they seemed appealing and intuitively likely to succeed. We argue that humans are vigilant cooperators, sensitive to cues of need in others, but also highly susceptible to the idea that others are cheating. This vigilance is particularly marked where they lack a reassuring stream of direct personal evidence to the contrary. The vigilance of human cooperative psychology makes ideas of greater conditionality and punishment easy for politicians to conceive of and sell. However, set against this, there are principles that can be used and successfully appealed to in advocating greater generosity in welfare systems. These include the fundamental social similarity of recipients and non-recipients, and the idea that resources are not generated individually but represent the common windfall of a whole group.Key messagesHumans are vigilant cooperators, motivated to help others, but attuned to cues of cheating.Vigilant cooperation drives popular intuitions about how welfare systems should work.This can be illustrated by examining changes to UK disability benefits.Appealing to popular intuitions does not necessarily lead to optimal policy making.
AB - This paper represents a collaboration between a policy researcher and a behavioural scientist who studies cooperation. Our goal was to develop a shared understanding of one particular policy topic, the reforms to the UK system of disability benefits initiated during the last term of the New Labour Government and accelerated under the Conservative-led administrations since 2010. These reforms introduced much stronger focus on conditionality and assessment, aiming to reduce the cost of the benefit by identifying and removing ‘cheaters’ or ‘undeserving’ recipients from the system. The reforms have failed by even their own stated goals. Here, we seek to understand why they seemed appealing and intuitively likely to succeed. We argue that humans are vigilant cooperators, sensitive to cues of need in others, but also highly susceptible to the idea that others are cheating. This vigilance is particularly marked where they lack a reassuring stream of direct personal evidence to the contrary. The vigilance of human cooperative psychology makes ideas of greater conditionality and punishment easy for politicians to conceive of and sell. However, set against this, there are principles that can be used and successfully appealed to in advocating greater generosity in welfare systems. These include the fundamental social similarity of recipients and non-recipients, and the idea that resources are not generated individually but represent the common windfall of a whole group.Key messagesHumans are vigilant cooperators, motivated to help others, but attuned to cues of cheating.Vigilant cooperation drives popular intuitions about how welfare systems should work.This can be illustrated by examining changes to UK disability benefits.Appealing to popular intuitions does not necessarily lead to optimal policy making.
KW - Disability
KW - Welfare
KW - Cooperation
KW - Generosity
KW - Vigilance
U2 - 10.1332/204378920x15989751152011
DO - 10.1332/204378920x15989751152011
M3 - Journal article
JO - Global Discourse
JF - Global Discourse
SN - 2326-9995
ER -