Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Feasibility study of transcutaneous electrical ...
View graph of relations

Feasibility study of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer bone pain.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Feasibility study of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer bone pain. / Bennett, Michael I.; Johnson, Mark I.; Brown, Sarah et al.

In: The Journal of Pain, Vol. 11, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 351-359.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Bennett, MI, Johnson, MI, Brown, S, Radford, H, Brown, JM & Searle, RD 2010, 'Feasibility study of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer bone pain.', The Journal of Pain, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 351-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.002

APA

Bennett, M. I., Johnson, M. I., Brown, S., Radford, H., Brown, J. M., & Searle, R. D. (2010). Feasibility study of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer bone pain. The Journal of Pain, 11(4), 351-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.002

Vancouver

Bennett MI, Johnson MI, Brown S, Radford H, Brown JM, Searle RD. Feasibility study of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer bone pain. The Journal of Pain. 2010 Apr;11(4):351-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.002

Author

Bennett, Michael I. ; Johnson, Mark I. ; Brown, Sarah et al. / Feasibility study of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer bone pain. In: The Journal of Pain. 2010 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 351-359.

Bibtex

@article{5d93a82464654a41bc4aeaa5c5230701,
title = "Feasibility study of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer bone pain.",
abstract = "This multicenter study assessed the feasibility of conducting a phase III trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in patients with cancer bone pain recruited from palliative care services. Eligible patients received active and placebo TENS for 1 hour at site of pain in a randomized crossover design; median interval between applications 3 days. Responses assessed at 30 and 60 minutes included numerical and verbal ratings of pain at rest and on movement, and pain relief. Recruitment, tolerability, adverse events, and effectiveness of blinding were also evaluated. Twenty-four patients were randomised and 19 completed both applications. The intervention was well tolerated. Five patients withdrew: 3 due to deteriorating performance status, and 2 due to increased pain (1 each following active and placebo TENS). Confidence interval estimation around the differences in outcomes between active and placebo TENS suggests that TENS has the potential to decrease pain on movement more than pain on rest. Nine patients did not consider that a placebo was used; the remaining 10 correctly identified placebo TENS. Feasibility studies are important in palliative care prior to undertaking clinical trials. Our findings suggest that further work is required on recruitment strategies and refining the control arm before evaluating TENS in cancer bone pain.",
keywords = "Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS), pain, cancer of bone, randomized controlled trial, palliative care",
author = "Bennett, {Michael I.} and Johnson, {Mark I.} and Sarah Brown and Helen Radford and Brown, {Julia M.} and Searle, {Robert D.}",
year = "2010",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "351--359",
journal = "The Journal of Pain",
issn = "1526-5900",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility study of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer bone pain.

AU - Bennett, Michael I.

AU - Johnson, Mark I.

AU - Brown, Sarah

AU - Radford, Helen

AU - Brown, Julia M.

AU - Searle, Robert D.

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - This multicenter study assessed the feasibility of conducting a phase III trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in patients with cancer bone pain recruited from palliative care services. Eligible patients received active and placebo TENS for 1 hour at site of pain in a randomized crossover design; median interval between applications 3 days. Responses assessed at 30 and 60 minutes included numerical and verbal ratings of pain at rest and on movement, and pain relief. Recruitment, tolerability, adverse events, and effectiveness of blinding were also evaluated. Twenty-four patients were randomised and 19 completed both applications. The intervention was well tolerated. Five patients withdrew: 3 due to deteriorating performance status, and 2 due to increased pain (1 each following active and placebo TENS). Confidence interval estimation around the differences in outcomes between active and placebo TENS suggests that TENS has the potential to decrease pain on movement more than pain on rest. Nine patients did not consider that a placebo was used; the remaining 10 correctly identified placebo TENS. Feasibility studies are important in palliative care prior to undertaking clinical trials. Our findings suggest that further work is required on recruitment strategies and refining the control arm before evaluating TENS in cancer bone pain.

AB - This multicenter study assessed the feasibility of conducting a phase III trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in patients with cancer bone pain recruited from palliative care services. Eligible patients received active and placebo TENS for 1 hour at site of pain in a randomized crossover design; median interval between applications 3 days. Responses assessed at 30 and 60 minutes included numerical and verbal ratings of pain at rest and on movement, and pain relief. Recruitment, tolerability, adverse events, and effectiveness of blinding were also evaluated. Twenty-four patients were randomised and 19 completed both applications. The intervention was well tolerated. Five patients withdrew: 3 due to deteriorating performance status, and 2 due to increased pain (1 each following active and placebo TENS). Confidence interval estimation around the differences in outcomes between active and placebo TENS suggests that TENS has the potential to decrease pain on movement more than pain on rest. Nine patients did not consider that a placebo was used; the remaining 10 correctly identified placebo TENS. Feasibility studies are important in palliative care prior to undertaking clinical trials. Our findings suggest that further work is required on recruitment strategies and refining the control arm before evaluating TENS in cancer bone pain.

KW - Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS)

KW - pain

KW - cancer of bone

KW - randomized controlled trial

KW - palliative care

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 351

EP - 359

JO - The Journal of Pain

JF - The Journal of Pain

SN - 1526-5900

IS - 4

ER -