Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Feminism, sociology of scientific knowledge and...
View graph of relations

Feminism, sociology of scientific knowledge and postmodernism: politics, theory and me

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Feminism, sociology of scientific knowledge and postmodernism: politics, theory and me. / Singleton, V .
In: Social Studies of Science, Vol. 26, No. 2, 05.1996, p. 445-468.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Singleton V. Feminism, sociology of scientific knowledge and postmodernism: politics, theory and me. Social Studies of Science. 1996 May;26(2):445-468. doi: 10.1177/030631296026002010

Author

Singleton, V . / Feminism, sociology of scientific knowledge and postmodernism : politics, theory and me. In: Social Studies of Science. 1996 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 445-468.

Bibtex

@article{ac96be3083a74ade87cb1f76107a93ac,
title = "Feminism, sociology of scientific knowledge and postmodernism: politics, theory and me",
abstract = "Is postmodernism debilitating for feminists approaching science? is the actor-network approach, which rejects dualisms and universalism, politically impotent Or is such a critique epistemologically conservative? I explore these questions by drawing on empirical research examining the UK Cervical Screening Programme (CSP). Specifically, I attempt to answer the question of whether or not women should participate in the CSP and undertake a cervical smear test Because the CSP is constantly changing as participants' identities multiply in negotiation, I propose that there is no stable paint from which a single decision about lay participation can be made, however politically useful it may be to do so, I demonstrate my discomfort with talking about whether women should or should not participate. Given the dynamic nature of the Programme, a 'should' discourse is inappropriate, and can also be guilt-inducing and oppressive to women. My preference is for a discourse which emphasizes that women could participate.",
keywords = "SCREENING-PROGRAM",
author = "V Singleton",
year = "1996",
month = may,
doi = "10.1177/030631296026002010",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "445--468",
journal = "Social Studies of Science",
issn = "0306-3127",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feminism, sociology of scientific knowledge and postmodernism

T2 - politics, theory and me

AU - Singleton, V

PY - 1996/5

Y1 - 1996/5

N2 - Is postmodernism debilitating for feminists approaching science? is the actor-network approach, which rejects dualisms and universalism, politically impotent Or is such a critique epistemologically conservative? I explore these questions by drawing on empirical research examining the UK Cervical Screening Programme (CSP). Specifically, I attempt to answer the question of whether or not women should participate in the CSP and undertake a cervical smear test Because the CSP is constantly changing as participants' identities multiply in negotiation, I propose that there is no stable paint from which a single decision about lay participation can be made, however politically useful it may be to do so, I demonstrate my discomfort with talking about whether women should or should not participate. Given the dynamic nature of the Programme, a 'should' discourse is inappropriate, and can also be guilt-inducing and oppressive to women. My preference is for a discourse which emphasizes that women could participate.

AB - Is postmodernism debilitating for feminists approaching science? is the actor-network approach, which rejects dualisms and universalism, politically impotent Or is such a critique epistemologically conservative? I explore these questions by drawing on empirical research examining the UK Cervical Screening Programme (CSP). Specifically, I attempt to answer the question of whether or not women should participate in the CSP and undertake a cervical smear test Because the CSP is constantly changing as participants' identities multiply in negotiation, I propose that there is no stable paint from which a single decision about lay participation can be made, however politically useful it may be to do so, I demonstrate my discomfort with talking about whether women should or should not participate. Given the dynamic nature of the Programme, a 'should' discourse is inappropriate, and can also be guilt-inducing and oppressive to women. My preference is for a discourse which emphasizes that women could participate.

KW - SCREENING-PROGRAM

U2 - 10.1177/030631296026002010

DO - 10.1177/030631296026002010

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 445

EP - 468

JO - Social Studies of Science

JF - Social Studies of Science

SN - 0306-3127

IS - 2

ER -