Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Fighting Nihilism through Promoting a New Faith...
View graph of relations

Fighting Nihilism through Promoting a New Faith: Heidegger within the Debates of his Time

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)

Published

Standard

Fighting Nihilism through Promoting a New Faith: Heidegger within the Debates of his Time. / Rohkramer, Thomas.
The Movement of Nihilism: Heidegger's Thinking after Nietzsche. ed. / Laurence P. Hemming; Bogdan Costea; Kostas Amiridis. London and New York: Continuum, 2011. p. 39-53.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter (peer-reviewed)

Harvard

Rohkramer, T 2011, Fighting Nihilism through Promoting a New Faith: Heidegger within the Debates of his Time. in LP Hemming, B Costea & K Amiridis (eds), The Movement of Nihilism: Heidegger's Thinking after Nietzsche. Continuum, London and New York, pp. 39-53. <http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/the-movement-of-nihilism-9781441168092/>

APA

Rohkramer, T. (2011). Fighting Nihilism through Promoting a New Faith: Heidegger within the Debates of his Time. In L. P. Hemming, B. Costea, & K. Amiridis (Eds.), The Movement of Nihilism: Heidegger's Thinking after Nietzsche (pp. 39-53). Continuum. http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/the-movement-of-nihilism-9781441168092/

Vancouver

Rohkramer T. Fighting Nihilism through Promoting a New Faith: Heidegger within the Debates of his Time. In Hemming LP, Costea B, Amiridis K, editors, The Movement of Nihilism: Heidegger's Thinking after Nietzsche. London and New York: Continuum. 2011. p. 39-53

Author

Rohkramer, Thomas. / Fighting Nihilism through Promoting a New Faith: Heidegger within the Debates of his Time. The Movement of Nihilism: Heidegger's Thinking after Nietzsche. editor / Laurence P. Hemming ; Bogdan Costea ; Kostas Amiridis. London and New York : Continuum, 2011. pp. 39-53

Bibtex

@inbook{9785d9e9f7c640348b8c30d2b0efbbfc,
title = "Fighting Nihilism through Promoting a New Faith: Heidegger within the Debates of his Time",
abstract = "Heidegger not only engaged with the great minds of the occidental tradition but also drew on trends of his time and responded to current debates. He was, above all, part of a strong tradition in German history that saw a pluralistic and divided society as a dangerous form of nihilism which needed to be overcome by a new single communal faith. In 1933, Heidegger sided with Hitler and the Nazis because to him they promised such a new faith. While he came to distance himself from Nazism by identifying the Third Reich with the 'technological frenzy' that also characterised in his mind the Soviet Union and the United States, he continued to hold on to the belief that only a new communal faith could save humanity. Technology was not the ultimate danger for him, but a humanity which was not guided by a non-humanistic faith.",
author = "Thomas Rohkramer",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-4411-6809-2",
pages = "39--53",
editor = "Hemming, {Laurence P.} and Bogdan Costea and Kostas Amiridis",
booktitle = "The Movement of Nihilism",
publisher = "Continuum",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Fighting Nihilism through Promoting a New Faith: Heidegger within the Debates of his Time

AU - Rohkramer, Thomas

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Heidegger not only engaged with the great minds of the occidental tradition but also drew on trends of his time and responded to current debates. He was, above all, part of a strong tradition in German history that saw a pluralistic and divided society as a dangerous form of nihilism which needed to be overcome by a new single communal faith. In 1933, Heidegger sided with Hitler and the Nazis because to him they promised such a new faith. While he came to distance himself from Nazism by identifying the Third Reich with the 'technological frenzy' that also characterised in his mind the Soviet Union and the United States, he continued to hold on to the belief that only a new communal faith could save humanity. Technology was not the ultimate danger for him, but a humanity which was not guided by a non-humanistic faith.

AB - Heidegger not only engaged with the great minds of the occidental tradition but also drew on trends of his time and responded to current debates. He was, above all, part of a strong tradition in German history that saw a pluralistic and divided society as a dangerous form of nihilism which needed to be overcome by a new single communal faith. In 1933, Heidegger sided with Hitler and the Nazis because to him they promised such a new faith. While he came to distance himself from Nazism by identifying the Third Reich with the 'technological frenzy' that also characterised in his mind the Soviet Union and the United States, he continued to hold on to the belief that only a new communal faith could save humanity. Technology was not the ultimate danger for him, but a humanity which was not guided by a non-humanistic faith.

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 978-1-4411-6809-2

SP - 39

EP - 53

BT - The Movement of Nihilism

A2 - Hemming, Laurence P.

A2 - Costea, Bogdan

A2 - Amiridis, Kostas

PB - Continuum

CY - London and New York

ER -