Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Fixing fictions through blended finance

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Fixing fictions through blended finance: The entrepreneurial ensemble and risk interpretation in the Blue Economy

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Fixing fictions through blended finance: The entrepreneurial ensemble and risk interpretation in the Blue Economy. / Christiansen, J.
In: Geoforum, Vol. 120, 01.03.2021, p. 93-102.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Christiansen J. Fixing fictions through blended finance: The entrepreneurial ensemble and risk interpretation in the Blue Economy. Geoforum. 2021 Mar 1;120:93-102. Epub 2021 Feb 5. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.013

Author

Bibtex

@article{54aac0ee42864d558f29cbf6af56e068,
title = "Fixing fictions through blended finance: The entrepreneurial ensemble and risk interpretation in the Blue Economy",
abstract = "The notion of blended finance has increasingly gained traction within development policy as a way to fill a series of “financing gaps” related to the Sustainable Development Goals. Recently, blended finance has received increased attention as a way to create biodiversity markets and attract private capital. Building on qualitative research on efforts to create markets for private investments in marine conservation, this paper analyses how an ensemble of non-governmental organisations, development finance institutions and philanthropists seek to fill the financing gap for marine conservation in the “Blue Economy” by using blended finance as a guiding principle. I argue that by offsetting the uncertainties related to investing in a new conservation finance space, blended finance is applied as a way to fix investors{\textquoteright} fictional expectations and gradually transform uncertainty in risk. In doing so, this paper contributes to the literature on for-profit biodiversity conservation by highlighting how capital's risk interpretations are constitutive of the effort to create new markets. While blended finance is applied to create new markets from below, I discuss two other possible futures that might emerge as blended finance is applied in this new frontier. On the one hand, it risks becoming a development rent that is captured by the financial sector. On the other hand, blended finance can become a technical solution that enables the maintenance of a primordial faith in market-based environmental governance.",
keywords = "Biodiversity conservation, Blended finance, Blue Economy, Fictional expectations, Neoliberal natures, Risk",
author = "J. Christiansen",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.013",
language = "English",
volume = "120",
pages = "93--102",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fixing fictions through blended finance

T2 - The entrepreneurial ensemble and risk interpretation in the Blue Economy

AU - Christiansen, J.

PY - 2021/3/1

Y1 - 2021/3/1

N2 - The notion of blended finance has increasingly gained traction within development policy as a way to fill a series of “financing gaps” related to the Sustainable Development Goals. Recently, blended finance has received increased attention as a way to create biodiversity markets and attract private capital. Building on qualitative research on efforts to create markets for private investments in marine conservation, this paper analyses how an ensemble of non-governmental organisations, development finance institutions and philanthropists seek to fill the financing gap for marine conservation in the “Blue Economy” by using blended finance as a guiding principle. I argue that by offsetting the uncertainties related to investing in a new conservation finance space, blended finance is applied as a way to fix investors’ fictional expectations and gradually transform uncertainty in risk. In doing so, this paper contributes to the literature on for-profit biodiversity conservation by highlighting how capital's risk interpretations are constitutive of the effort to create new markets. While blended finance is applied to create new markets from below, I discuss two other possible futures that might emerge as blended finance is applied in this new frontier. On the one hand, it risks becoming a development rent that is captured by the financial sector. On the other hand, blended finance can become a technical solution that enables the maintenance of a primordial faith in market-based environmental governance.

AB - The notion of blended finance has increasingly gained traction within development policy as a way to fill a series of “financing gaps” related to the Sustainable Development Goals. Recently, blended finance has received increased attention as a way to create biodiversity markets and attract private capital. Building on qualitative research on efforts to create markets for private investments in marine conservation, this paper analyses how an ensemble of non-governmental organisations, development finance institutions and philanthropists seek to fill the financing gap for marine conservation in the “Blue Economy” by using blended finance as a guiding principle. I argue that by offsetting the uncertainties related to investing in a new conservation finance space, blended finance is applied as a way to fix investors’ fictional expectations and gradually transform uncertainty in risk. In doing so, this paper contributes to the literature on for-profit biodiversity conservation by highlighting how capital's risk interpretations are constitutive of the effort to create new markets. While blended finance is applied to create new markets from below, I discuss two other possible futures that might emerge as blended finance is applied in this new frontier. On the one hand, it risks becoming a development rent that is captured by the financial sector. On the other hand, blended finance can become a technical solution that enables the maintenance of a primordial faith in market-based environmental governance.

KW - Biodiversity conservation

KW - Blended finance

KW - Blue Economy

KW - Fictional expectations

KW - Neoliberal natures

KW - Risk

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.013

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.01.013

M3 - Journal article

VL - 120

SP - 93

EP - 102

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -