Accepted author manuscript, 1.03 MB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Flattery, Truth-telling and Social Theory
AU - Diken, Bulent
PY - 2025/4/2
Y1 - 2025/4/2
N2 - The paper deals with the ‘problem’ of flattery (kolakeia) as a specific form of activity contrasted to parrhesia. Who is the flatterer? In which ethical-political contexts does the flatterer act? With what cultural, social, and political consequences? Discussing such questions, the paper revitalizes the concept of flattery, showing its enduring constitutive role in social life. I start with giving an account of flattery in ancient literature, focusing on Aristotle, Plato, and Aristophanes. Then I move to early modernity and discuss Machiavelli’s and Castiglione’s approach to flattery. Finally, I turn to flattery in late modernity. This analysis is coupled with a discussion of de Certeau’s concept ‘tactics’ and the concept of ‘profanation’ in Spinoza and Agamben, concepts that are apparently comparable to flattery but are very different. To end with, the paper synthesizes its arguments and relates different styles of flattery to each other systematically, discussing some practical-political consequences of flattery.
AB - The paper deals with the ‘problem’ of flattery (kolakeia) as a specific form of activity contrasted to parrhesia. Who is the flatterer? In which ethical-political contexts does the flatterer act? With what cultural, social, and political consequences? Discussing such questions, the paper revitalizes the concept of flattery, showing its enduring constitutive role in social life. I start with giving an account of flattery in ancient literature, focusing on Aristotle, Plato, and Aristophanes. Then I move to early modernity and discuss Machiavelli’s and Castiglione’s approach to flattery. Finally, I turn to flattery in late modernity. This analysis is coupled with a discussion of de Certeau’s concept ‘tactics’ and the concept of ‘profanation’ in Spinoza and Agamben, concepts that are apparently comparable to flattery but are very different. To end with, the paper synthesizes its arguments and relates different styles of flattery to each other systematically, discussing some practical-political consequences of flattery.
KW - Flattery, Social theory, Tactics, Profanation, Parrhesia
U2 - 10.1177/02632764251323864
DO - 10.1177/02632764251323864
M3 - Journal article
JO - Theory, Culture and Society
JF - Theory, Culture and Society
SN - 0263-2764
ER -