Accepted author manuscript, 257 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Followership is not following
T2 - Reframing followership in Western higher education
AU - Chircop, James
PY - 2024/11/8
Y1 - 2024/11/8
N2 - This article examined meanings of followership in Western higher education as reported in the literature. To retrieve sources, an electronic search was implemented. The search procedure included the terms ‘followership’ and ‘education’ on six databases and other sources. Examination of relevant works found that, in Western higher education, ‘followership’ takes a different meaning than what is currently reported in the literature. Views of self-control and agency, and strong notions of autonomy and independence surfaced, aligning with academic ideas of critical and independent thinking, and academic freedom. Indeed, many academics did not align with the idea of being a follower as well as the perspective of followership as the deference to another individual. It was revealed that what academics do in Western higher education cannot be described by the term ‘followership’. In this context, ‘followership’ is more accurately described as an endeavor related to contribution and making a difference; thus, a case for an afresh term was made. It was argued that a new term should acknowledge academics’ autonomy and independence, and that academics ‘volunteer’ but do not ‘subordinate.’ Resultantly, the term ‘endeavorship’ was offered.
AB - This article examined meanings of followership in Western higher education as reported in the literature. To retrieve sources, an electronic search was implemented. The search procedure included the terms ‘followership’ and ‘education’ on six databases and other sources. Examination of relevant works found that, in Western higher education, ‘followership’ takes a different meaning than what is currently reported in the literature. Views of self-control and agency, and strong notions of autonomy and independence surfaced, aligning with academic ideas of critical and independent thinking, and academic freedom. Indeed, many academics did not align with the idea of being a follower as well as the perspective of followership as the deference to another individual. It was revealed that what academics do in Western higher education cannot be described by the term ‘followership’. In this context, ‘followership’ is more accurately described as an endeavor related to contribution and making a difference; thus, a case for an afresh term was made. It was argued that a new term should acknowledge academics’ autonomy and independence, and that academics ‘volunteer’ but do not ‘subordinate.’ Resultantly, the term ‘endeavorship’ was offered.
U2 - 10.1080/13603124.2024.2369994
DO - 10.1080/13603124.2024.2369994
M3 - Journal article
JO - International Journal of Leadership in Education
JF - International Journal of Leadership in Education
SN - 1360-3124
ER -