Proof, 501 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Food System Resilience: Concepts, Issues, and Challenges. / Zurek, Monika; Ingram, John; Bellamy, Angelina Sanderson et al.
In: Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 47, No. 1, 20.09.2022.Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Food System Resilience: Concepts, Issues, and Challenges
AU - Zurek, Monika
AU - Ingram, John
AU - Bellamy, Angelina Sanderson
AU - Goold, Conor
AU - Lyon, Christopher
AU - Alexander, Peter
AU - Barnes, Andrew
AU - Bebber, Daniel P.
AU - Breeze, Tom D.
AU - Bruce, Ann
AU - Collins, Lisa M.
AU - Davies, Jessica
AU - Doherty, Bob
AU - Ensor, Jonathan
AU - Franco, Sofia C.
AU - Gatto, Andrea
AU - Hess, Tim
AU - Lamprinopoulou, Chrysa
AU - Liu, Lingxuan
AU - Merkle, Magnus
AU - Norton, Lisa
AU - Oliver, Tom
AU - Ollerton, Jeff
AU - Potts, Simon
AU - Reed, Mark S.
AU - Sutcliffe, Chloe
AU - Withers, Paul J.A.
PY - 2022/9/20
Y1 - 2022/9/20
N2 - Food system resilience has multiple dimensions. We draw on food system and resilience concepts and review resilience framings of different communities. We present four questions to frame food system resilience (Resilience of what? Resilience to what? Resilience from whose perspective? Resilience for how long?) and three approaches to enhancing resilience (robustness, recovery, and reorientation—the three “Rs”). We focus on enhancing resilience of food system outcomes and argue this will require food system actors adapting their activities, noting that activities do not change spontaneously but in response to a change in drivers: an opportunity or a threat. However, operationalizing resilience enhancement involves normative choices and will result in decisions having to be negotiated about trade-offs among food system outcomes for different stakeholders. New approaches to including different food system actors’ perceptions and goals are needed to build food systems that are better positioned to address challenges of the future. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Volume 47 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
AB - Food system resilience has multiple dimensions. We draw on food system and resilience concepts and review resilience framings of different communities. We present four questions to frame food system resilience (Resilience of what? Resilience to what? Resilience from whose perspective? Resilience for how long?) and three approaches to enhancing resilience (robustness, recovery, and reorientation—the three “Rs”). We focus on enhancing resilience of food system outcomes and argue this will require food system actors adapting their activities, noting that activities do not change spontaneously but in response to a change in drivers: an opportunity or a threat. However, operationalizing resilience enhancement involves normative choices and will result in decisions having to be negotiated about trade-offs among food system outcomes for different stakeholders. New approaches to including different food system actors’ perceptions and goals are needed to build food systems that are better positioned to address challenges of the future. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Volume 47 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
KW - General Environmental Science
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744
DO - 10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744
M3 - Journal article
VL - 47
JO - Annual Review of Environment and Resources
JF - Annual Review of Environment and Resources
SN - 1543-5938
IS - 1
ER -