Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > From “a fair game” to “a form of covert research”


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

From “a fair game” to “a form of covert research”: Research Ethics Committee Members differing notions of consent and potential risk to participants within social media research.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/04/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
Issue number2
Number of pages11
Pages (from-to)149-159
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date19/01/18
<mark>Original language</mark>English


Social media (SM) research presents new challenges for research ethics committees (RECs) who must balance familiar ethical principles with new notions of public availability. This article qualitatively examines how U.K. REC members view this balance in terms of risk and consent. While it found significant variance overall, there were discernible experience-based trends. REC members with less experience of reviewing SM held inflexible notions of consent and risk that could be categorized as either relying on traditional notions of requiring direct consent, or viewing publicly available data as “fair game.” More experienced REC members took a more nuanced approach to data use and consent. We conclude that the more nuanced approach should be best practice during ethical review of SM research.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13 (2), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/jre on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/