From attribution to argumentation: the case of disappearing discourse.

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

From attribution to argumentation: the case of disappearing discourse. / Antaki, C.; Leudar, I.
In: Canadian Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1992, p. 594-599.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Author

Antaki, C. ; Leudar, I. / From attribution to argumentation: the case of disappearing discourse. In: Canadian Psychology. 1992 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 594-599.

Bibtex

@article{ea611090926c43088df7c968b4dc6380,

title = "From attribution to argumentation: the case of disappearing discourse.",

abstract = "Argues that attribution theory constructed its own version of F. Heider's (1958) starting position and that the limitations of this construction are only now becoming apparent. The linguistic turn prevalent elsewhere in the social sciences is now showing up the weaknesses in attribution theory's conception of people as explainers, and offers a new way forward with the conception of people as discourse-users.",

author = "C. Antaki and I. Leudar",

year = "1992",

language = "English",

volume = "33",

pages = "594--599",

journal = "Canadian Psychology",

issn = "1878-7304",

publisher = "Canadian Psychological Association",

number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - From attribution to argumentation: the case of disappearing discourse.

AU - Antaki, C.

AU - Leudar, I.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Argues that attribution theory constructed its own version of F. Heider's (1958) starting position and that the limitations of this construction are only now becoming apparent. The linguistic turn prevalent elsewhere in the social sciences is now showing up the weaknesses in attribution theory's conception of people as explainers, and offers a new way forward with the conception of people as discourse-users.

AB - Argues that attribution theory constructed its own version of F. Heider's (1958) starting position and that the limitations of this construction are only now becoming apparent. The linguistic turn prevalent elsewhere in the social sciences is now showing up the weaknesses in attribution theory's conception of people as explainers, and offers a new way forward with the conception of people as discourse-users.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 33

SP - 594

EP - 599

JO - Canadian Psychology

JF - Canadian Psychology

SN - 1878-7304

IS - 3

ER -

Research

Links