Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > From grumpy to cheerful (and back)

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

From grumpy to cheerful (and back): How power impacts mood in and across different contexts

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

From grumpy to cheerful (and back): How power impacts mood in and across different contexts. / Leach, Stefan; Weick, Mario.
In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 79, 30.11.2018, p. 107-114.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Leach S, Weick M. From grumpy to cheerful (and back): How power impacts mood in and across different contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2018 Nov 30;79:107-114. Epub 2018 Jul 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.004

Author

Leach, Stefan ; Weick, Mario. / From grumpy to cheerful (and back) : How power impacts mood in and across different contexts. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 79. pp. 107-114.

Bibtex

@article{98f096d61c364104978dcd39ab472333,
title = "From grumpy to cheerful (and back): How power impacts mood in and across different contexts",
abstract = "Although lay intuition and some academic theories suggest that power increases variability in mood, the prevailing view in the literature is that power elevates mood—a view that is not consistently borne out in empirical data. To rectify these discrepancies, we conducted five studies examining the impact of high and low power on mood in, and across, contexts of differing valence (negative vs. neutral vs. positive). Drawing on 19,710 observations from 1,042 participants, we found that high (vs. medium/control) power elevated, and low (vs. medium/control) power dampened, individuals{\textquoteright} mood at baseline/in neutral contexts and in positive contexts. However, neither high (vs. medium/control) power nor low (vs. medium/control) power modulated individuals{\textquoteright} mood in negative contexts. Overall, high (vs. medium/control) power tended to increase, and low (vs. medium/control) power decreased variability in mood across contexts (the former effect was marginally significant). We discuss how these findings corroborate, but also qualify, lay intuition and social psychological theories of power.",
keywords = "Context, Mood, Social power, Variability",
author = "Stefan Leach and Mario Weick",
year = "2018",
month = nov,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.004",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "107--114",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - From grumpy to cheerful (and back)

T2 - How power impacts mood in and across different contexts

AU - Leach, Stefan

AU - Weick, Mario

PY - 2018/11/30

Y1 - 2018/11/30

N2 - Although lay intuition and some academic theories suggest that power increases variability in mood, the prevailing view in the literature is that power elevates mood—a view that is not consistently borne out in empirical data. To rectify these discrepancies, we conducted five studies examining the impact of high and low power on mood in, and across, contexts of differing valence (negative vs. neutral vs. positive). Drawing on 19,710 observations from 1,042 participants, we found that high (vs. medium/control) power elevated, and low (vs. medium/control) power dampened, individuals’ mood at baseline/in neutral contexts and in positive contexts. However, neither high (vs. medium/control) power nor low (vs. medium/control) power modulated individuals’ mood in negative contexts. Overall, high (vs. medium/control) power tended to increase, and low (vs. medium/control) power decreased variability in mood across contexts (the former effect was marginally significant). We discuss how these findings corroborate, but also qualify, lay intuition and social psychological theories of power.

AB - Although lay intuition and some academic theories suggest that power increases variability in mood, the prevailing view in the literature is that power elevates mood—a view that is not consistently borne out in empirical data. To rectify these discrepancies, we conducted five studies examining the impact of high and low power on mood in, and across, contexts of differing valence (negative vs. neutral vs. positive). Drawing on 19,710 observations from 1,042 participants, we found that high (vs. medium/control) power elevated, and low (vs. medium/control) power dampened, individuals’ mood at baseline/in neutral contexts and in positive contexts. However, neither high (vs. medium/control) power nor low (vs. medium/control) power modulated individuals’ mood in negative contexts. Overall, high (vs. medium/control) power tended to increase, and low (vs. medium/control) power decreased variability in mood across contexts (the former effect was marginally significant). We discuss how these findings corroborate, but also qualify, lay intuition and social psychological theories of power.

KW - Context

KW - Mood

KW - Social power

KW - Variability

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.004

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85049953781

VL - 79

SP - 107

EP - 114

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -