Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > From Infrastructural Breakdown to Data Vandalism

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

From Infrastructural Breakdown to Data Vandalism: Repoliticizing the Smart City?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

From Infrastructural Breakdown to Data Vandalism: Repoliticizing the Smart City? / Hoyng, Rolien Susanne.
In: Television and New Media, Vol. 17, No. 5, 01.07.2016, p. 397-415.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hoyng RS. From Infrastructural Breakdown to Data Vandalism: Repoliticizing the Smart City? Television and New Media. 2016 Jul 1;17(5):397-415. Epub 2015 Dec 2. doi: 10.1177/1527476415617032

Author

Hoyng, Rolien Susanne. / From Infrastructural Breakdown to Data Vandalism : Repoliticizing the Smart City?. In: Television and New Media. 2016 ; Vol. 17, No. 5. pp. 397-415.

Bibtex

@article{de228e3b0af94d31b57e31bbe0ca7263,
title = "From Infrastructural Breakdown to Data Vandalism: Repoliticizing the Smart City?",
abstract = "The smart city is often approached by its critics as a “system” that exploits optimal connectivity and efficiency for an urban society of control. Meanwhile, the actual operation of “smart city” assemblages in globalizing cities—characterized by development and breakdown, connectivity and disconnection—is seldom the basis of analysis. By focusing on the interplays between these dualities, this article aims to underscore the modalities of power and political possibilities of dissent in Istanbul, Turkey. Data-based smart city apparatuses are supposed to at once fix infrastructural breakdown and stabilize the socio-political order. However, during the Gezi protests of 2013, the integrated tactics of sabotage in urban space and data vandalism in the digital realm undermined both data control by the state and its political authority. Yet Gezi{\textquoteright}s example also shows that hyperconnectivity, data motility, and virality by themselves do not necessarily lead to more meaningful participation in urban politics.",
author = "Hoyng, {Rolien Susanne}",
year = "2016",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1527476415617032",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "397--415",
journal = "Television and New Media",
issn = "1527-4764",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Infrastructural Breakdown to Data Vandalism

T2 - Repoliticizing the Smart City?

AU - Hoyng, Rolien Susanne

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - The smart city is often approached by its critics as a “system” that exploits optimal connectivity and efficiency for an urban society of control. Meanwhile, the actual operation of “smart city” assemblages in globalizing cities—characterized by development and breakdown, connectivity and disconnection—is seldom the basis of analysis. By focusing on the interplays between these dualities, this article aims to underscore the modalities of power and political possibilities of dissent in Istanbul, Turkey. Data-based smart city apparatuses are supposed to at once fix infrastructural breakdown and stabilize the socio-political order. However, during the Gezi protests of 2013, the integrated tactics of sabotage in urban space and data vandalism in the digital realm undermined both data control by the state and its political authority. Yet Gezi’s example also shows that hyperconnectivity, data motility, and virality by themselves do not necessarily lead to more meaningful participation in urban politics.

AB - The smart city is often approached by its critics as a “system” that exploits optimal connectivity and efficiency for an urban society of control. Meanwhile, the actual operation of “smart city” assemblages in globalizing cities—characterized by development and breakdown, connectivity and disconnection—is seldom the basis of analysis. By focusing on the interplays between these dualities, this article aims to underscore the modalities of power and political possibilities of dissent in Istanbul, Turkey. Data-based smart city apparatuses are supposed to at once fix infrastructural breakdown and stabilize the socio-political order. However, during the Gezi protests of 2013, the integrated tactics of sabotage in urban space and data vandalism in the digital realm undermined both data control by the state and its political authority. Yet Gezi’s example also shows that hyperconnectivity, data motility, and virality by themselves do not necessarily lead to more meaningful participation in urban politics.

U2 - 10.1177/1527476415617032

DO - 10.1177/1527476415617032

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 397

EP - 415

JO - Television and New Media

JF - Television and New Media

SN - 1527-4764

IS - 5

ER -