Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Functional similarities and differences between...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Functional similarities and differences between the coding of positional information in verbal and spatial short-term order memory

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Functional similarities and differences between the coding of positional information in verbal and spatial short-term order memory. / Hurlstone, Mark John.
In: Memory, Vol. 27, No. 2, 07.02.2019, p. 147-162 .

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{f521e9b038a1452692a8793382e01f74,
title = "Functional similarities and differences between the coding of positional information in verbal and spatial short-term order memory",
abstract = "Temporal grouping effects in verbal and spatial serial recall suggest that the representation of serial order in verbal and spatial short-term memory (STM) incorporates positional information. However, not all effects of grouping are created equal in the verbal and spatial domains. Although grouping a sequence of verbal items engenders an increase in between-group transpositions that maintain their within-group position, grouping a sequence of spatial items does not engender an increase in these so-called interposition errors. Here I present experimental and computational modeling evidence which suggests that positional information is represented in subtly different ways in verbal and spatial STM. Specifically, the findings indicate that in verbal STM, groups are coded for their position in a sequence and items are coded for their position in a group. By contrast, in spatial STM groups are coded for their position in a sequence, but items are coded for their position in a sequence, rather than in a group. Findings support the notion that positional information in verbal and spatial STM is represented by modality-specific mechanisms rather than a domain-general system.",
author = "Hurlstone, {Mark John}",
year = "2019",
month = feb,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1080/09658211.2018.1495235",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "147--162 ",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Psychology Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional similarities and differences between the coding of positional information in verbal and spatial short-term order memory

AU - Hurlstone, Mark John

PY - 2019/2/7

Y1 - 2019/2/7

N2 - Temporal grouping effects in verbal and spatial serial recall suggest that the representation of serial order in verbal and spatial short-term memory (STM) incorporates positional information. However, not all effects of grouping are created equal in the verbal and spatial domains. Although grouping a sequence of verbal items engenders an increase in between-group transpositions that maintain their within-group position, grouping a sequence of spatial items does not engender an increase in these so-called interposition errors. Here I present experimental and computational modeling evidence which suggests that positional information is represented in subtly different ways in verbal and spatial STM. Specifically, the findings indicate that in verbal STM, groups are coded for their position in a sequence and items are coded for their position in a group. By contrast, in spatial STM groups are coded for their position in a sequence, but items are coded for their position in a sequence, rather than in a group. Findings support the notion that positional information in verbal and spatial STM is represented by modality-specific mechanisms rather than a domain-general system.

AB - Temporal grouping effects in verbal and spatial serial recall suggest that the representation of serial order in verbal and spatial short-term memory (STM) incorporates positional information. However, not all effects of grouping are created equal in the verbal and spatial domains. Although grouping a sequence of verbal items engenders an increase in between-group transpositions that maintain their within-group position, grouping a sequence of spatial items does not engender an increase in these so-called interposition errors. Here I present experimental and computational modeling evidence which suggests that positional information is represented in subtly different ways in verbal and spatial STM. Specifically, the findings indicate that in verbal STM, groups are coded for their position in a sequence and items are coded for their position in a group. By contrast, in spatial STM groups are coded for their position in a sequence, but items are coded for their position in a sequence, rather than in a group. Findings support the notion that positional information in verbal and spatial STM is represented by modality-specific mechanisms rather than a domain-general system.

U2 - 10.1080/09658211.2018.1495235

DO - 10.1080/09658211.2018.1495235

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 147

EP - 162

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 2

ER -