Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Furthering critical institutionalism

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Furthering critical institutionalism

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Furthering critical institutionalism. / Cleaver, Frances; De Koning, Jessica.
In: International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Cleaver, F & De Koning, J 2015, 'Furthering critical institutionalism', International Journal of the Commons, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.605

APA

Cleaver, F., & De Koning, J. (2015). Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.605

Vancouver

Cleaver F, De Koning J. Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons. 2015 Jan 1;9(1):1-18. doi: 10.18352/ijc.605

Author

Cleaver, Frances ; De Koning, Jessica. / Furthering critical institutionalism. In: International Journal of the Commons. 2015 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 1-18.

Bibtex

@article{4a53fa0ebd904d4a9a2d472cd37754a1,
title = "Furthering critical institutionalism",
abstract = "This special issue furthers the study of natural resource management from a critical institutional perspective. Critical institutionalism (CI) is a contemporary body of thought that explores how institutions dynamically mediate relationships between people, natural resources and society. It focuses on the complexity of institutions entwined in everyday social life, their historical formation, the interplay between formal and informal, traditional and modern arrangements, and the power relations that animate them. In such perspectives a social justice lens is often used to scrutinise the outcomes of institutional processes. We argue here that critical institutional approaches have potentially much to offer commons scholarship, particularly through the explanatory power of the concept of bricolage for better understanding institutional change. Critical institutional approaches, gathering momentum over the past 15 years or so, have excited considerable interest but the insights generated from different disciplinary perspectives remain insufficiently synthesised. Analyses emphasising complexity can be relatively illegible to policy-makers, a fact which lessens their reach. This special issue therefore aims to synthesise critical institutional ideas and so to lay the foundation for moving beyond the emergent stage to make meaningful academic and policy impact. In bringing together papers here we define and synthesise key themes of critical institutionalism, outline the concept of institutional bricolage and identity some key challenges facing this school of thought.",
keywords = "Agency, Common-pool resources, Critical institutionalism, Institutional bricolage, Institutions",
author = "Frances Cleaver and {De Koning}, Jessica",
year = "2015",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.18352/ijc.605",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "International Journal of the Commons",
issn = "1875-0281",
publisher = "International Association for the Study of the Commons",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Furthering critical institutionalism

AU - Cleaver, Frances

AU - De Koning, Jessica

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - This special issue furthers the study of natural resource management from a critical institutional perspective. Critical institutionalism (CI) is a contemporary body of thought that explores how institutions dynamically mediate relationships between people, natural resources and society. It focuses on the complexity of institutions entwined in everyday social life, their historical formation, the interplay between formal and informal, traditional and modern arrangements, and the power relations that animate them. In such perspectives a social justice lens is often used to scrutinise the outcomes of institutional processes. We argue here that critical institutional approaches have potentially much to offer commons scholarship, particularly through the explanatory power of the concept of bricolage for better understanding institutional change. Critical institutional approaches, gathering momentum over the past 15 years or so, have excited considerable interest but the insights generated from different disciplinary perspectives remain insufficiently synthesised. Analyses emphasising complexity can be relatively illegible to policy-makers, a fact which lessens their reach. This special issue therefore aims to synthesise critical institutional ideas and so to lay the foundation for moving beyond the emergent stage to make meaningful academic and policy impact. In bringing together papers here we define and synthesise key themes of critical institutionalism, outline the concept of institutional bricolage and identity some key challenges facing this school of thought.

AB - This special issue furthers the study of natural resource management from a critical institutional perspective. Critical institutionalism (CI) is a contemporary body of thought that explores how institutions dynamically mediate relationships between people, natural resources and society. It focuses on the complexity of institutions entwined in everyday social life, their historical formation, the interplay between formal and informal, traditional and modern arrangements, and the power relations that animate them. In such perspectives a social justice lens is often used to scrutinise the outcomes of institutional processes. We argue here that critical institutional approaches have potentially much to offer commons scholarship, particularly through the explanatory power of the concept of bricolage for better understanding institutional change. Critical institutional approaches, gathering momentum over the past 15 years or so, have excited considerable interest but the insights generated from different disciplinary perspectives remain insufficiently synthesised. Analyses emphasising complexity can be relatively illegible to policy-makers, a fact which lessens their reach. This special issue therefore aims to synthesise critical institutional ideas and so to lay the foundation for moving beyond the emergent stage to make meaningful academic and policy impact. In bringing together papers here we define and synthesise key themes of critical institutionalism, outline the concept of institutional bricolage and identity some key challenges facing this school of thought.

KW - Agency

KW - Common-pool resources

KW - Critical institutionalism

KW - Institutional bricolage

KW - Institutions

U2 - 10.18352/ijc.605

DO - 10.18352/ijc.605

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84924910037

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - International Journal of the Commons

JF - International Journal of the Commons

SN - 1875-0281

IS - 1

ER -