Rights statement: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=RIS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Review of International Studies, 42 (1), pp 156-177 2016, © 2016 Cambridge University Press.
Accepted author manuscript, 284 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Futures beyond “the West”?
T2 - autoimmunity in China’s harmonious world
AU - Nordin, Astrid
N1 - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=RIS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Review of International Studies, 42 (1), pp 156-177 2016, © 2016 Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2016/1
Y1 - 2016/1
N2 - It has become fashionable amongst International Relations scholars to draw on the concept of “autoimmunity”, which some call “the ultimate horizon in which contemporary politics inscribes itself”. To these scholars, most of whom draw on the thought of Jacques Derrida, such logics open systems up to a future to come. At the same time, they tend to identify such logics with Europe, America, Western modernity and/or democracy. Implied, and sometimes explicit, in their accounts is the denial of autoimmune logics at work outside such an imagined configuration.This paper challenges that denial through arguing that the system of “harmony”, deployed in contemporary China, also works on an autoimmune logic. If autoimmunity opens up a system to the future, this is not only so for European democracy or its derivatives. Moreover, the expulsion of “non-Western” others from accounts of autoimmunity undermines their rethinking of difference by falling back on an immunitary logic, denying China an open future. This exclusion is their condition of possibility. At the same time, this exclusion is what keeps open their promise of its future to come. Paradoxically, the exclusion of the “non- West” is what keeps the idea of an autoimmune “Western” or European democracy alive.
AB - It has become fashionable amongst International Relations scholars to draw on the concept of “autoimmunity”, which some call “the ultimate horizon in which contemporary politics inscribes itself”. To these scholars, most of whom draw on the thought of Jacques Derrida, such logics open systems up to a future to come. At the same time, they tend to identify such logics with Europe, America, Western modernity and/or democracy. Implied, and sometimes explicit, in their accounts is the denial of autoimmune logics at work outside such an imagined configuration.This paper challenges that denial through arguing that the system of “harmony”, deployed in contemporary China, also works on an autoimmune logic. If autoimmunity opens up a system to the future, this is not only so for European democracy or its derivatives. Moreover, the expulsion of “non-Western” others from accounts of autoimmunity undermines their rethinking of difference by falling back on an immunitary logic, denying China an open future. This exclusion is their condition of possibility. At the same time, this exclusion is what keeps open their promise of its future to come. Paradoxically, the exclusion of the “non- West” is what keeps the idea of an autoimmune “Western” or European democracy alive.
KW - China
KW - harmony
KW - the future
KW - autoimmunity
KW - Jacques Derrida
U2 - 10.1017/S026021051500011X
DO - 10.1017/S026021051500011X
M3 - Journal article
VL - 42
SP - 156
EP - 177
JO - Review of International Studies
JF - Review of International Studies
SN - 0260-2105
IS - 1
ER -