Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Gadgets on the move and in stasis

Research

Electronic data

  • Policy report on wearable sensors

    Rights statement: This report is freely available for fair use (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use).

    Accepted author manuscript, 210 KB, PDF document

Keywords

View graph of relations

Gadgets on the move and in stasis: consumer and medical electronics, what's the difference? (summary of findings and policy recommendations).

Research output: Book/Report/Proceedings › Commissioned report

Published

Standard

Gadgets on the move and in stasis: consumer and medical electronics, what's the difference? (summary of findings and policy recommendations). / Gunnarsdottir, Kristrun; Dijk, Niels van; Fotopoulou, Aristea et al.
Lancaster University, 2015. 9 p.

Research output: Book/Report/Proceedings › Commissioned report

Harvard

Gunnarsdottir, K, Dijk, NV, Fotopoulou, A, Guimarães Pereira, Â, O'Riordan, K, Rommetveit, K & Vesnic-Alujevic, L 2015, Gadgets on the move and in stasis: consumer and medical electronics, what's the difference? (summary of findings and policy recommendations). vol. WP3 Policy Report, March/April 2015 (EPINET Deliverable D8.3, April 2015), Lancaster University.

APA

Gunnarsdottir, K., Dijk, N. V., Fotopoulou, A., Guimarães Pereira, Â., O'Riordan, K., Rommetveit, K., & Vesnic-Alujevic, L. (2015). Gadgets on the move and in stasis: consumer and medical electronics, what's the difference? (summary of findings and policy recommendations). Lancaster University.

Vancouver

Gunnarsdottir K, Dijk NV, Fotopoulou A, Guimarães Pereira Â, O'Riordan K, Rommetveit K et al. Gadgets on the move and in stasis: consumer and medical electronics, what's the difference? (summary of findings and policy recommendations). Lancaster University, 2015. 9 p.

Author

Gunnarsdottir, Kristrun ; Dijk, Niels van ; Fotopoulou, Aristea et al. / Gadgets on the move and in stasis : consumer and medical electronics, what's the difference? (summary of findings and policy recommendations). Lancaster University, 2015. 9 p.

Bibtex

@book{d4a8123197e64c5db30dc217989b9acf,
title = "Gadgets on the move and in stasis: consumer and medical electronics, what's the difference? (summary of findings and policy recommendations).",
abstract = "This document provides a set of policy recommendations, based on the findings of a three-year long case study on wearable sensors. The key objective was to assess state-of-the-art developments in this domain of innovation, using evaluation and analytic methods that correspond with the expertise and experience available on our study team and among our associates in industry and innovation, medicine, policy, grass roots activism, STS and ELS study traditions. Our aim is to provide guidelines for good governance of wearable sensors, in light of their potential roles in medical settings as well as their currency as consumer electronics for quasi-medical purposes. We provide recommendations for ongoing innovation in this field, considering the necessity of mutual recognition and reflexive knowledge exchange among innovators and industrial actors, medical expertise, scholarly and technical assessments, patient organisations and grass roots activism, policy developers and regulators.",
keywords = "Wearable sensors, Health consumers, Healthcare policy, Public health, Terms of service, Informational bodies, Media ritual, Data protection, Self-trackers, Self care, Governance, Innovation, Policy making",
author = "Kristrun Gunnarsdottir and Dijk, {Niels van} and Aristea Fotopoulou and {Guimar{\~a}es Pereira}, {\^A}ngela and Kate O'Riordan and Kjetil Rommetveit and Lucia Vesnic-Alujevic",
year = "2015",
month = apr,
language = "English",
volume = "WP3 Policy Report, March/April 2015 (EPINET Deliverable D8.3, April 2015)",
publisher = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Gadgets on the move and in stasis

T2 - consumer and medical electronics, what's the difference? (summary of findings and policy recommendations).

AU - Gunnarsdottir, Kristrun

AU - Dijk, Niels van

AU - Fotopoulou, Aristea

AU - Guimarães Pereira, Ângela

AU - O'Riordan, Kate

AU - Rommetveit, Kjetil

AU - Vesnic-Alujevic, Lucia

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - This document provides a set of policy recommendations, based on the findings of a three-year long case study on wearable sensors. The key objective was to assess state-of-the-art developments in this domain of innovation, using evaluation and analytic methods that correspond with the expertise and experience available on our study team and among our associates in industry and innovation, medicine, policy, grass roots activism, STS and ELS study traditions. Our aim is to provide guidelines for good governance of wearable sensors, in light of their potential roles in medical settings as well as their currency as consumer electronics for quasi-medical purposes. We provide recommendations for ongoing innovation in this field, considering the necessity of mutual recognition and reflexive knowledge exchange among innovators and industrial actors, medical expertise, scholarly and technical assessments, patient organisations and grass roots activism, policy developers and regulators.

AB - This document provides a set of policy recommendations, based on the findings of a three-year long case study on wearable sensors. The key objective was to assess state-of-the-art developments in this domain of innovation, using evaluation and analytic methods that correspond with the expertise and experience available on our study team and among our associates in industry and innovation, medicine, policy, grass roots activism, STS and ELS study traditions. Our aim is to provide guidelines for good governance of wearable sensors, in light of their potential roles in medical settings as well as their currency as consumer electronics for quasi-medical purposes. We provide recommendations for ongoing innovation in this field, considering the necessity of mutual recognition and reflexive knowledge exchange among innovators and industrial actors, medical expertise, scholarly and technical assessments, patient organisations and grass roots activism, policy developers and regulators.

KW - Wearable sensors

KW - Health consumers

KW - Healthcare policy

KW - Public health

KW - Terms of service

KW - Informational bodies

KW - Media ritual

KW - Data protection

KW - Self-trackers

KW - Self care

KW - Governance

KW - Innovation

KW - Policy making

M3 - Commissioned report

VL - WP3 Policy Report, March/April 2015 (EPINET Deliverable D8.3, April 2015)

BT - Gadgets on the move and in stasis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -