Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Gender Differences in Innovation Design

Electronic data

  • Gender Differences in Innovation Design - Final Author Version

    Rights statement: © ACM, 2020. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in OzCHI '20: 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3441000.3441021

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.18 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Gender Differences in Innovation Design: A Thematic Conversation Analysis

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published
Publication date2/12/2020
Host publicationOzCHI '20: 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherACM
Pages270-280
Number of pages11
ISBN (electronic)9781450389754
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

This study investigates aspects of the role gender plays in participatory design innovation workshops; reflecting on both the process and the output. Often when gender and design are discussed, the problems raised concern a lack of women as designers or developers [1], but there appear to be gaps in addressing full gender representation when it comes to users in the design process. In this study, a design workshop was run where participants, two men and five women were asked initially to identify or generate problems and possible digital solutions concerning their academic studies, and then to design their top self-selected solution. The workshop was recorded and transcribed, and conversation and discourse analysis were carried out which found gender to influence problem raising, language used and group practices. The paper concludes both that gender apparently plays a strong role in group dynamics with regards to design innovation; and that thematic conversation and discourse analysis provides an appropriate and insightful approach to understanding these issues. 

Bibliographic note

© ACM, 2020. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in OzCHI '20: 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3441000.3441021