Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Gender, language and prejudice

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Gender, language and prejudice: Implicit sexism in the discourse of Boris Johnson

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Gender, language and prejudice : Implicit sexism in the discourse of Boris Johnson. / Sunderland, J.

In: Open Linguistics, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.08.2020, p. 323-333.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sunderland J. Gender, language and prejudice: Implicit sexism in the discourse of Boris Johnson. Open Linguistics. 2020 Aug 1;6(1):323-333. Epub 2020 Jul 27. doi: 10.1515/opli-2020-0022

Author

Bibtex

@article{895c228c930c4fbaa3efd9a02046f2a8,
title = "Gender, language and prejudice: Implicit sexism in the discourse of Boris Johnson",
abstract = "While linguistic prejudice is commonly understood to concern individuals or social groups because of the way they speak, we can also see it as damaging language used about individuals or social groups. In this article, I start by looking at the traditional sociolinguistic understanding of linguistic prejudice, then go on to look rather widely at various forms of prejudicial/sexist language about women. In doing so, I identify various lexical asymmetries and associated {"}lexical gaps{"}. The main part of the article takes this further by exploring how certain insults to men draw on an understood prejudice again women. I illustrate this with a {"}telling case{"}: three naturally occurring examples of prejudicial, sexist language recently used by British prime minister Boris Johnson: big girl's blouse, man up and girly swot. For all three to work, they draw on what we might call a discourse of {"}Women as ineffectual{"}. I conclude with a discussion of intentionality as regards this sort of prejudicial language use, what it is intended to achieve and how it can be resisted. {\textcopyright} 2020 Jane Sunderland, published by De Gruyter 2020.",
keywords = "Asymmetry, Gender, insults, Intentionality, Lexical gap, Political discourse, Prejudice, Sexist language",
author = "J. Sunderland",
year = "2020",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/opli-2020-0022",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "323--333",
journal = "Open Linguistics",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender, language and prejudice

T2 - Implicit sexism in the discourse of Boris Johnson

AU - Sunderland, J.

PY - 2020/8/1

Y1 - 2020/8/1

N2 - While linguistic prejudice is commonly understood to concern individuals or social groups because of the way they speak, we can also see it as damaging language used about individuals or social groups. In this article, I start by looking at the traditional sociolinguistic understanding of linguistic prejudice, then go on to look rather widely at various forms of prejudicial/sexist language about women. In doing so, I identify various lexical asymmetries and associated "lexical gaps". The main part of the article takes this further by exploring how certain insults to men draw on an understood prejudice again women. I illustrate this with a "telling case": three naturally occurring examples of prejudicial, sexist language recently used by British prime minister Boris Johnson: big girl's blouse, man up and girly swot. For all three to work, they draw on what we might call a discourse of "Women as ineffectual". I conclude with a discussion of intentionality as regards this sort of prejudicial language use, what it is intended to achieve and how it can be resisted. © 2020 Jane Sunderland, published by De Gruyter 2020.

AB - While linguistic prejudice is commonly understood to concern individuals or social groups because of the way they speak, we can also see it as damaging language used about individuals or social groups. In this article, I start by looking at the traditional sociolinguistic understanding of linguistic prejudice, then go on to look rather widely at various forms of prejudicial/sexist language about women. In doing so, I identify various lexical asymmetries and associated "lexical gaps". The main part of the article takes this further by exploring how certain insults to men draw on an understood prejudice again women. I illustrate this with a "telling case": three naturally occurring examples of prejudicial, sexist language recently used by British prime minister Boris Johnson: big girl's blouse, man up and girly swot. For all three to work, they draw on what we might call a discourse of "Women as ineffectual". I conclude with a discussion of intentionality as regards this sort of prejudicial language use, what it is intended to achieve and how it can be resisted. © 2020 Jane Sunderland, published by De Gruyter 2020.

KW - Asymmetry

KW - Gender

KW - insults

KW - Intentionality

KW - Lexical gap

KW - Political discourse

KW - Prejudice

KW - Sexist language

U2 - 10.1515/opli-2020-0022

DO - 10.1515/opli-2020-0022

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 323

EP - 333

JO - Open Linguistics

JF - Open Linguistics

IS - 1

ER -