Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Geopower

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Geopower: a panel on Elizabeth Grosz’s "Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth"

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Geopower: a panel on Elizabeth Grosz’s "Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth". / Yusoff, Kathryn; Grosz, Elizabeth; Clark, Nigel et al.
In: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2012, p. 971–988.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Yusoff K, Grosz E, Clark N, Saldanha A, Nash C. Geopower: a panel on Elizabeth Grosz’s "Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth". Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2012;30(6):971–988. doi: 10.1068/d3006pan

Author

Yusoff, Kathryn ; Grosz, Elizabeth ; Clark, Nigel et al. / Geopower : a panel on Elizabeth Grosz’s "Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth". In: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2012 ; Vol. 30, No. 6. pp. 971–988.

Bibtex

@article{ac89b0ce0fe047acbaef883594e77cf1,
title = "Geopower: a panel on Elizabeth Grosz{\textquoteright}s {"}Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth{"}",
abstract = "Rather than understand art as cultural accomplishment, Elizabeth Grosz argues that it is born from the intensities of chaos and disruptive forms of sexual selection—a corporeality that vibrates to the hum of the universe. Grosz contends that it is precisely this excessive, nonproductive expenditure of sexual attraction that is the condition for art{\textquoteright}s work. This intimate corporeality, composed of nonhuman forces, is what draws and transforms the cosmos, prompting experimentation with materiality, sensation, and life. In the book Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth (2008, Duke University Press, Durham, NC), that is the subject of this panel discussion, Grosz sets out an ontology of art, looking at its forms of emergence as territorialising force, sexual selection, and nonhuman power. In Grosz{\textquoteright}s terms, art is an art of existence. This is not a narrow understanding of art as a practice that is about taste, cultural accomplishment, or a reflection of society, but an art that is—at its most provocative—an extraction from the universe and an elaboration on it. This {\textquoteleft}geoaesthetics{\textquoteright}, that is both biospheric and biopolitical, presents a formable challenge to geographers interested in art, sexuality, time, and the territorialisation of the earth. How might we understand this distinctly different kind of biopolitics? And what might Grosz{\textquoteright}s concept of {\textquoteleft}geopower{\textquoteright} offer in terms of a renegotiation of a more active {\textquoteleft}geo{\textquoteright} in geopolitics? Grosz argues that art is not tied to the reproduction of the known, but to the possibility of the new, overcoming the containment of the present to elaborate on futures yet to come. In this rethinking of sexual selection Grosz suggests an intensely political role for art as a bioaesthetics that is charged with the creation of new worlds and forms of life. Grosz makes a radical argument for a feminist philosophy of the biosphere and for our thinking the world otherwise.",
keywords = "Elizabeth Grosz, Geopolitics, Geopower, Art, Deleuze, feminist theory, Anthropocene, Earth",
author = "Kathryn Yusoff and Elizabeth Grosz and Nigel Clark and Arun Saldanha and Catherine Nash",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1068/d3006pan",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "971–988",
journal = "Environment and Planning D: Society and Space",
issn = "0263-7758",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "6",
note = "AAG Annual Meeting ; Conference date: 01-03-1999",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geopower

T2 - AAG Annual Meeting

AU - Yusoff, Kathryn

AU - Grosz, Elizabeth

AU - Clark, Nigel

AU - Saldanha, Arun

AU - Nash, Catherine

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Rather than understand art as cultural accomplishment, Elizabeth Grosz argues that it is born from the intensities of chaos and disruptive forms of sexual selection—a corporeality that vibrates to the hum of the universe. Grosz contends that it is precisely this excessive, nonproductive expenditure of sexual attraction that is the condition for art’s work. This intimate corporeality, composed of nonhuman forces, is what draws and transforms the cosmos, prompting experimentation with materiality, sensation, and life. In the book Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth (2008, Duke University Press, Durham, NC), that is the subject of this panel discussion, Grosz sets out an ontology of art, looking at its forms of emergence as territorialising force, sexual selection, and nonhuman power. In Grosz’s terms, art is an art of existence. This is not a narrow understanding of art as a practice that is about taste, cultural accomplishment, or a reflection of society, but an art that is—at its most provocative—an extraction from the universe and an elaboration on it. This ‘geoaesthetics’, that is both biospheric and biopolitical, presents a formable challenge to geographers interested in art, sexuality, time, and the territorialisation of the earth. How might we understand this distinctly different kind of biopolitics? And what might Grosz’s concept of ‘geopower’ offer in terms of a renegotiation of a more active ‘geo’ in geopolitics? Grosz argues that art is not tied to the reproduction of the known, but to the possibility of the new, overcoming the containment of the present to elaborate on futures yet to come. In this rethinking of sexual selection Grosz suggests an intensely political role for art as a bioaesthetics that is charged with the creation of new worlds and forms of life. Grosz makes a radical argument for a feminist philosophy of the biosphere and for our thinking the world otherwise.

AB - Rather than understand art as cultural accomplishment, Elizabeth Grosz argues that it is born from the intensities of chaos and disruptive forms of sexual selection—a corporeality that vibrates to the hum of the universe. Grosz contends that it is precisely this excessive, nonproductive expenditure of sexual attraction that is the condition for art’s work. This intimate corporeality, composed of nonhuman forces, is what draws and transforms the cosmos, prompting experimentation with materiality, sensation, and life. In the book Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth (2008, Duke University Press, Durham, NC), that is the subject of this panel discussion, Grosz sets out an ontology of art, looking at its forms of emergence as territorialising force, sexual selection, and nonhuman power. In Grosz’s terms, art is an art of existence. This is not a narrow understanding of art as a practice that is about taste, cultural accomplishment, or a reflection of society, but an art that is—at its most provocative—an extraction from the universe and an elaboration on it. This ‘geoaesthetics’, that is both biospheric and biopolitical, presents a formable challenge to geographers interested in art, sexuality, time, and the territorialisation of the earth. How might we understand this distinctly different kind of biopolitics? And what might Grosz’s concept of ‘geopower’ offer in terms of a renegotiation of a more active ‘geo’ in geopolitics? Grosz argues that art is not tied to the reproduction of the known, but to the possibility of the new, overcoming the containment of the present to elaborate on futures yet to come. In this rethinking of sexual selection Grosz suggests an intensely political role for art as a bioaesthetics that is charged with the creation of new worlds and forms of life. Grosz makes a radical argument for a feminist philosophy of the biosphere and for our thinking the world otherwise.

KW - Elizabeth Grosz

KW - Geopolitics

KW - Geopower

KW - Art

KW - Deleuze

KW - feminist theory

KW - Anthropocene

KW - Earth

U2 - 10.1068/d3006pan

DO - 10.1068/d3006pan

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 971

EP - 988

JO - Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

JF - Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

SN - 0263-7758

IS - 6

Y2 - 1 March 1999

ER -