Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > ‘Getting people on board’
View graph of relations

‘Getting people on board’: Discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

‘Getting people on board’: Discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings. / Wodak, Ruth; Kwon, Winston; Clarke, Ian.
In: Discourse and Society, Vol. 22, No. 5, 2011, p. 592-644.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Wodak R, Kwon W, Clarke I. ‘Getting people on board’: Discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings. Discourse and Society. 2011;22(5):592-644. doi: 10.1177/0957926511405410

Author

Wodak, Ruth ; Kwon, Winston ; Clarke, Ian. / ‘Getting people on board’ : Discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings. In: Discourse and Society. 2011 ; Vol. 22, No. 5. pp. 592-644.

Bibtex

@article{ba40024d412847368bbaee87e6b60fe0,
title = "{\textquoteleft}Getting people on board{\textquoteright}: Discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings",
abstract = "Meetings are increasingly seen as sites where organizing and strategic change take place, but the role of specific discursive strategies and related linguistic-pragmatic and argumentative devices, employed by meeting chairs, is little understood. The purpose of this article is to address the range of behaviours of chairs in business organizations by comparing strategies employed by the same chief executive officer (CEO) in two key meeting genres: regular management team meetings and {\textquoteleft}away-days{\textquoteright}. While drawing on research from organization studies on the role of leadership in meetings and studies of language in the workplace from (socio)linguistics and discourse studies, we abductively identified five salient discursive strategies which meeting chairs employ in driving decision making: (1) Bonding; (2) Encouraging; (3) Directing; (4) Modulating; and (5) Re/Committing. We investigate the leadership styles of the CEO in both meeting genres via a multi-level approach using empirical data drawn from meetings of a single management team in a multinational defence corporation. Our key findings are, first, that the chair of the meetings (and leading manager) influences the outcome of the meetings in both negative and positive ways, through the choice of discursive strategies. Second, it becomes apparent that the specific context and related meeting genre mediate participation and the ability of the chair to control interactions within the team. Third, a more hierarchical authoritarian or a more interpersonal egalitarian leadership style can be identified via specific combinations of these five discursive strategies. The article concludes that the egalitarian leadership style increases the likelihood of achieving a durable consensus. Several related avenues for research are outlined. ",
keywords = "context analysis, critical discourse analysis (CDA) , discursive leadership strategies , ethnography , meetings, transactional leadership, transformational leadership, workplace discourse",
author = "Ruth Wodak and Winston Kwon and Ian Clarke",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1177/0957926511405410",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "592--644",
journal = "Discourse and Society",
issn = "0957-9265",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Getting people on board’

T2 - Discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings

AU - Wodak, Ruth

AU - Kwon, Winston

AU - Clarke, Ian

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Meetings are increasingly seen as sites where organizing and strategic change take place, but the role of specific discursive strategies and related linguistic-pragmatic and argumentative devices, employed by meeting chairs, is little understood. The purpose of this article is to address the range of behaviours of chairs in business organizations by comparing strategies employed by the same chief executive officer (CEO) in two key meeting genres: regular management team meetings and ‘away-days’. While drawing on research from organization studies on the role of leadership in meetings and studies of language in the workplace from (socio)linguistics and discourse studies, we abductively identified five salient discursive strategies which meeting chairs employ in driving decision making: (1) Bonding; (2) Encouraging; (3) Directing; (4) Modulating; and (5) Re/Committing. We investigate the leadership styles of the CEO in both meeting genres via a multi-level approach using empirical data drawn from meetings of a single management team in a multinational defence corporation. Our key findings are, first, that the chair of the meetings (and leading manager) influences the outcome of the meetings in both negative and positive ways, through the choice of discursive strategies. Second, it becomes apparent that the specific context and related meeting genre mediate participation and the ability of the chair to control interactions within the team. Third, a more hierarchical authoritarian or a more interpersonal egalitarian leadership style can be identified via specific combinations of these five discursive strategies. The article concludes that the egalitarian leadership style increases the likelihood of achieving a durable consensus. Several related avenues for research are outlined.

AB - Meetings are increasingly seen as sites where organizing and strategic change take place, but the role of specific discursive strategies and related linguistic-pragmatic and argumentative devices, employed by meeting chairs, is little understood. The purpose of this article is to address the range of behaviours of chairs in business organizations by comparing strategies employed by the same chief executive officer (CEO) in two key meeting genres: regular management team meetings and ‘away-days’. While drawing on research from organization studies on the role of leadership in meetings and studies of language in the workplace from (socio)linguistics and discourse studies, we abductively identified five salient discursive strategies which meeting chairs employ in driving decision making: (1) Bonding; (2) Encouraging; (3) Directing; (4) Modulating; and (5) Re/Committing. We investigate the leadership styles of the CEO in both meeting genres via a multi-level approach using empirical data drawn from meetings of a single management team in a multinational defence corporation. Our key findings are, first, that the chair of the meetings (and leading manager) influences the outcome of the meetings in both negative and positive ways, through the choice of discursive strategies. Second, it becomes apparent that the specific context and related meeting genre mediate participation and the ability of the chair to control interactions within the team. Third, a more hierarchical authoritarian or a more interpersonal egalitarian leadership style can be identified via specific combinations of these five discursive strategies. The article concludes that the egalitarian leadership style increases the likelihood of achieving a durable consensus. Several related avenues for research are outlined.

KW - context analysis

KW - critical discourse analysis (CDA)

KW - discursive leadership strategies

KW - ethnography

KW - meetings

KW - transactional leadership

KW - transformational leadership

KW - workplace discourse

U2 - 10.1177/0957926511405410

DO - 10.1177/0957926511405410

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 592

EP - 644

JO - Discourse and Society

JF - Discourse and Society

SN - 0957-9265

IS - 5

ER -