Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates

Electronic data

  • Chambers_et_al-2019-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research__Earth_Surface

    Rights statement: Accepted for publication in Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface Copyright (2020) American Geophysical Union. Further reproduction or electronic distribution is not permitted. Chambers, J. R., Smith, M. W., Quincey, D. J., Carrivick, J. L., Ross, A. N., & James, M. R. ( 2020). Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates: Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125, e2019JF005167. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005167

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.87 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates: Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates: Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements. / Chambers, J.R.; Smith, M.W.; Quincey, D.J. et al.
In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, Vol. 125, No. 2, e2019JF005167, 05.02.2020.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Chambers, JR, Smith, MW, Quincey, DJ, Carrivick, JL, Ross, AN & James, MR 2020, 'Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates: Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements', Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, vol. 125, no. 2, e2019JF005167. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005167

APA

Chambers, J. R., Smith, M. W., Quincey, D. J., Carrivick, J. L., Ross, A. N., & James, M. R. (2020). Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates: Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125(2), Article e2019JF005167. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005167

Vancouver

Chambers JR, Smith MW, Quincey DJ, Carrivick JL, Ross AN, James MR. Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates: Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. 2020 Feb 5;125(2):e2019JF005167. Epub 2020 Feb 5. doi: 10.1029/2019JF005167

Author

Chambers, J.R. ; Smith, M.W. ; Quincey, D.J. et al. / Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates : Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface. 2020 ; Vol. 125, No. 2.

Bibtex

@article{4ab6022883a24684ba07eab9a30d5606,
title = "Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates: Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements",
abstract = "Calculation of the sensible and latent heat (turbulent) fluxes is required in order to close the surface energy budget of glaciers and model glacial melt. The aerodynamic roughness length, z0, is a key parameter in the bulk approach to calculating sensible heat flux; yet, z0 is commonly considered simply as a tuning parameter or generalized between surfaces and over time. Spatially and temporally distributed observations of z0 over ice are rare. Both direct (from wind towers and sonic anemometers) and indirect (from microtopographic surveys) measurements of z0 are subject to sensitivities and uncertainties that are often unstated or overlooked. In this study, we present a quantitative evaluation of aerodynamic profile-based and microtopographic methods and their effect on z0 using data collected from Storglaci{\"a}ren and Syd{\"o}stra Kaskasatj{\"a}kkaglaci{\"a}ren, Tarfala Valley, Arctic Sweden. Aggressive data filters discard most of the wind tower data but still produce realistic z0 values of 1.9 mm and 2 mm. Despite uncertainty introduced by scale and resolution dependence, microtopographic methods produced estimates of z0 comparable to wind tower values and those found on similar surfaces. We conclude that (1) in the absence of direct turbulent flux measurements from sonic anemometers, the profile and microtopographic methods provide realistic z0 values, (2) both 2D and 3D microtopographic methods are dependent on scale, resolution, and the chosen detrending method, and (3) careful calibration of these parameters could enable glacier-wide investigations of z0 from remotely sensed data, including those increasingly available from satellite platforms.",
keywords = "aerodynamics, glacier, latent heat flux, roughness, sensible heat flux, surface energy, Norrbotten, Storglaciaren, Sweden, Tarfala Valley",
author = "J.R. Chambers and M.W. Smith and D.J. Quincey and J.L. Carrivick and A.N. Ross and M.R. James",
note = "Accepted for publication in Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface Copyright (2020) American Geophysical Union. Further reproduction or electronic distribution is not permitted. Chambers, J. R., Smith, M. W., Quincey, D. J., Carrivick, J. L., Ross, A. N., & James, M. R. ( 2020). Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates: Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125, e2019JF005167. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005167",
year = "2020",
month = feb,
day = "5",
doi = "10.1029/2019JF005167",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface",
issn = "2169-9011",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates

T2 - Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements

AU - Chambers, J.R.

AU - Smith, M.W.

AU - Quincey, D.J.

AU - Carrivick, J.L.

AU - Ross, A.N.

AU - James, M.R.

N1 - Accepted for publication in Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface Copyright (2020) American Geophysical Union. Further reproduction or electronic distribution is not permitted. Chambers, J. R., Smith, M. W., Quincey, D. J., Carrivick, J. L., Ross, A. N., & James, M. R. ( 2020). Glacial Aerodynamic Roughness Estimates: Uncertainty, Sensitivity, and Precision in Field Measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 125, e2019JF005167. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JF005167

PY - 2020/2/5

Y1 - 2020/2/5

N2 - Calculation of the sensible and latent heat (turbulent) fluxes is required in order to close the surface energy budget of glaciers and model glacial melt. The aerodynamic roughness length, z0, is a key parameter in the bulk approach to calculating sensible heat flux; yet, z0 is commonly considered simply as a tuning parameter or generalized between surfaces and over time. Spatially and temporally distributed observations of z0 over ice are rare. Both direct (from wind towers and sonic anemometers) and indirect (from microtopographic surveys) measurements of z0 are subject to sensitivities and uncertainties that are often unstated or overlooked. In this study, we present a quantitative evaluation of aerodynamic profile-based and microtopographic methods and their effect on z0 using data collected from Storglaciären and Sydöstra Kaskasatjäkkaglaciären, Tarfala Valley, Arctic Sweden. Aggressive data filters discard most of the wind tower data but still produce realistic z0 values of 1.9 mm and 2 mm. Despite uncertainty introduced by scale and resolution dependence, microtopographic methods produced estimates of z0 comparable to wind tower values and those found on similar surfaces. We conclude that (1) in the absence of direct turbulent flux measurements from sonic anemometers, the profile and microtopographic methods provide realistic z0 values, (2) both 2D and 3D microtopographic methods are dependent on scale, resolution, and the chosen detrending method, and (3) careful calibration of these parameters could enable glacier-wide investigations of z0 from remotely sensed data, including those increasingly available from satellite platforms.

AB - Calculation of the sensible and latent heat (turbulent) fluxes is required in order to close the surface energy budget of glaciers and model glacial melt. The aerodynamic roughness length, z0, is a key parameter in the bulk approach to calculating sensible heat flux; yet, z0 is commonly considered simply as a tuning parameter or generalized between surfaces and over time. Spatially and temporally distributed observations of z0 over ice are rare. Both direct (from wind towers and sonic anemometers) and indirect (from microtopographic surveys) measurements of z0 are subject to sensitivities and uncertainties that are often unstated or overlooked. In this study, we present a quantitative evaluation of aerodynamic profile-based and microtopographic methods and their effect on z0 using data collected from Storglaciären and Sydöstra Kaskasatjäkkaglaciären, Tarfala Valley, Arctic Sweden. Aggressive data filters discard most of the wind tower data but still produce realistic z0 values of 1.9 mm and 2 mm. Despite uncertainty introduced by scale and resolution dependence, microtopographic methods produced estimates of z0 comparable to wind tower values and those found on similar surfaces. We conclude that (1) in the absence of direct turbulent flux measurements from sonic anemometers, the profile and microtopographic methods provide realistic z0 values, (2) both 2D and 3D microtopographic methods are dependent on scale, resolution, and the chosen detrending method, and (3) careful calibration of these parameters could enable glacier-wide investigations of z0 from remotely sensed data, including those increasingly available from satellite platforms.

KW - aerodynamics

KW - glacier

KW - latent heat flux

KW - roughness

KW - sensible heat flux

KW - surface energy

KW - Norrbotten

KW - Storglaciaren

KW - Sweden

KW - Tarfala Valley

U2 - 10.1029/2019JF005167

DO - 10.1029/2019JF005167

M3 - Journal article

VL - 125

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface

SN - 2169-9011

IS - 2

M1 - e2019JF005167

ER -