Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Governing Global Politics
View graph of relations

Governing Global Politics

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Governing Global Politics. / Harrison, Neil E.; Geyer, Robert.
Governing Complexity in the 21st Century. ed. / Neil E. Harrison; Robert Geyer. London: Routledge, 2021. p. 173-195.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Harrison, NE & Geyer, R 2021, Governing Global Politics. in NE Harrison & R Geyer (eds), Governing Complexity in the 21st Century. Routledge, London, pp. 173-195. <https://www.routledge.com/Governing-Complexity-in-the-21st-Century/Harrison-Geyer/p/book/9780367276270>

APA

Harrison, N. E., & Geyer, R. (2021). Governing Global Politics. In N. E. Harrison, & R. Geyer (Eds.), Governing Complexity in the 21st Century (pp. 173-195). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Governing-Complexity-in-the-21st-Century/Harrison-Geyer/p/book/9780367276270

Vancouver

Harrison NE, Geyer R. Governing Global Politics. In Harrison NE, Geyer R, editors, Governing Complexity in the 21st Century. London: Routledge. 2021. p. 173-195

Author

Harrison, Neil E. ; Geyer, Robert. / Governing Global Politics. Governing Complexity in the 21st Century. editor / Neil E. Harrison ; Robert Geyer. London : Routledge, 2021. pp. 173-195

Bibtex

@inbook{897c1e22f06343cab88211e72519f839,
title = "Governing Global Politics",
abstract = "Most thinking about the relations between states is stuck in an orderly perception of reality. The objective of theory and practice is commonly to create order out of the ever-changing natural disorder of self-interested states competing in a self-organised system. After summarising this thinking and the salient literature this chapter outlines the complexity thinking version of global politics which more accurately reflects the dynamic nature of global reality. Depending on the issue-area this may require accepting an ontology of global politics that privileges processes over entities and the rules of interaction over the characteristic of states and organizations that is notably the case in global environmental issues. The chapter then applies this process-based complexity thinking to the global climate issue, demonstrating that the approach is readily applicable and produces a more reasonable description of reality and a better explanation for the failure of states to agree on an effective mitigation strategy. However, the emergent scientific consensus has been an effective stimulant to action at lower scales. This section is followed by a short conclusion.",
author = "Harrison, {Neil E.} and Robert Geyer",
year = "2021",
month = nov,
day = "5",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780367276263",
pages = "173--195",
editor = "Harrison, {Neil E.} and Robert Geyer",
booktitle = "Governing Complexity in the 21st Century",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Governing Global Politics

AU - Harrison, Neil E.

AU - Geyer, Robert

PY - 2021/11/5

Y1 - 2021/11/5

N2 - Most thinking about the relations between states is stuck in an orderly perception of reality. The objective of theory and practice is commonly to create order out of the ever-changing natural disorder of self-interested states competing in a self-organised system. After summarising this thinking and the salient literature this chapter outlines the complexity thinking version of global politics which more accurately reflects the dynamic nature of global reality. Depending on the issue-area this may require accepting an ontology of global politics that privileges processes over entities and the rules of interaction over the characteristic of states and organizations that is notably the case in global environmental issues. The chapter then applies this process-based complexity thinking to the global climate issue, demonstrating that the approach is readily applicable and produces a more reasonable description of reality and a better explanation for the failure of states to agree on an effective mitigation strategy. However, the emergent scientific consensus has been an effective stimulant to action at lower scales. This section is followed by a short conclusion.

AB - Most thinking about the relations between states is stuck in an orderly perception of reality. The objective of theory and practice is commonly to create order out of the ever-changing natural disorder of self-interested states competing in a self-organised system. After summarising this thinking and the salient literature this chapter outlines the complexity thinking version of global politics which more accurately reflects the dynamic nature of global reality. Depending on the issue-area this may require accepting an ontology of global politics that privileges processes over entities and the rules of interaction over the characteristic of states and organizations that is notably the case in global environmental issues. The chapter then applies this process-based complexity thinking to the global climate issue, demonstrating that the approach is readily applicable and produces a more reasonable description of reality and a better explanation for the failure of states to agree on an effective mitigation strategy. However, the emergent scientific consensus has been an effective stimulant to action at lower scales. This section is followed by a short conclusion.

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85131987595

SN - 9780367276263

SN - 9780367276270

SP - 173

EP - 195

BT - Governing Complexity in the 21st Century

A2 - Harrison, Neil E.

A2 - Geyer, Robert

PB - Routledge

CY - London

ER -