Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Guiding carbon farming using interdisciplinary ...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Guiding carbon farming using interdisciplinary mixed methods mapping

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Guiding carbon farming using interdisciplinary mixed methods mapping. / Brockett, Beth F.T.; Beanland, Andrew; Whitfield, Michael George et al.

In: People and Nature, Vol. 1, No. 2, 01.06.2019, p. 191-203.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Brockett, BFT, Beanland, A, Whitfield, MG, Watson, NM, Blackburn, GA & Bardgett, R 2019, 'Guiding carbon farming using interdisciplinary mixed methods mapping', People and Nature, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.24

APA

Vancouver

Brockett BFT, Beanland A, Whitfield MG, Watson NM, Blackburn GA, Bardgett R. Guiding carbon farming using interdisciplinary mixed methods mapping. People and Nature. 2019 Jun 1;1(2):191-203. Epub 2019 Apr 30. doi: 10.1002/pan3.24

Author

Brockett, Beth F.T. ; Beanland, Andrew ; Whitfield, Michael George et al. / Guiding carbon farming using interdisciplinary mixed methods mapping. In: People and Nature. 2019 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 191-203.

Bibtex

@article{edbec308b906423ead48c34f7dd69157,
title = "Guiding carbon farming using interdisciplinary mixed methods mapping",
abstract = "In recognition of the need to address complex environmental problems, some ecological studies have adopted social research methods to better understand the complexity of social‐ecological systems management. The overwhelming majority of these studies stop short of fully embracing qualitative methodologies.The lack of integrative social and natural science data for a topic such as soil carbon farming is problematic as theoretical carbon sequestration opportunities identified through soil mapping and process‐based models can fail to deliver the sequestration levels promised when introduced on‐the‐ground. Such mapping needs to account for the human factors involved in delivering increased soil carbon on‐farm.Here, we develop a mixed methods mapping approach to explore the potential for increasing soil carbon stocks on upland farms in the UK. Our approach considers ecological and social complexity through application of soil science, ecology, participant observation, interviews and a focus group.Our maps revealed landscapes that are full of carbon farming opportunity, but contain previously hidden barriers to the delivery of increased soil carbon. For example, they revealed that carbon farming can be considered by farmers to work in opposition to perceived {\textquoteleft}good farming{\textquoteright} practices and be correlated with increased incidents of livestock disease. We also discovered that the use of maps in research can be problematic as they can close down discussion and exclude local representation of an area.Trialling an interdisciplinary mixed methods approach produced new, deeper and more richly‐textured understandings about how soil carbon management is produced socially as well as ecologically on upland livestock farms. Our findings have potential to improve the success of future carbon farming initiatives by incorporating farmer knowledge and social drivers of implementation.",
keywords = "agri‐environment, climate change, farming, interdisciplinary, local knowledge, mixed methods, qualitative mapping, soil carbon sequestration, soil carbon storage, uplands",
author = "Brockett, {Beth F.T.} and Andrew Beanland and Whitfield, {Michael George} and Watson, {Nigel Mark} and Blackburn, {George Alan} and Richard Bardgett",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/pan3.24",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "191--203",
journal = "People and Nature",
issn = "2575-8314",
publisher = "Wiley Open Access",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guiding carbon farming using interdisciplinary mixed methods mapping

AU - Brockett, Beth F.T.

AU - Beanland, Andrew

AU - Whitfield, Michael George

AU - Watson, Nigel Mark

AU - Blackburn, George Alan

AU - Bardgett, Richard

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - In recognition of the need to address complex environmental problems, some ecological studies have adopted social research methods to better understand the complexity of social‐ecological systems management. The overwhelming majority of these studies stop short of fully embracing qualitative methodologies.The lack of integrative social and natural science data for a topic such as soil carbon farming is problematic as theoretical carbon sequestration opportunities identified through soil mapping and process‐based models can fail to deliver the sequestration levels promised when introduced on‐the‐ground. Such mapping needs to account for the human factors involved in delivering increased soil carbon on‐farm.Here, we develop a mixed methods mapping approach to explore the potential for increasing soil carbon stocks on upland farms in the UK. Our approach considers ecological and social complexity through application of soil science, ecology, participant observation, interviews and a focus group.Our maps revealed landscapes that are full of carbon farming opportunity, but contain previously hidden barriers to the delivery of increased soil carbon. For example, they revealed that carbon farming can be considered by farmers to work in opposition to perceived ‘good farming’ practices and be correlated with increased incidents of livestock disease. We also discovered that the use of maps in research can be problematic as they can close down discussion and exclude local representation of an area.Trialling an interdisciplinary mixed methods approach produced new, deeper and more richly‐textured understandings about how soil carbon management is produced socially as well as ecologically on upland livestock farms. Our findings have potential to improve the success of future carbon farming initiatives by incorporating farmer knowledge and social drivers of implementation.

AB - In recognition of the need to address complex environmental problems, some ecological studies have adopted social research methods to better understand the complexity of social‐ecological systems management. The overwhelming majority of these studies stop short of fully embracing qualitative methodologies.The lack of integrative social and natural science data for a topic such as soil carbon farming is problematic as theoretical carbon sequestration opportunities identified through soil mapping and process‐based models can fail to deliver the sequestration levels promised when introduced on‐the‐ground. Such mapping needs to account for the human factors involved in delivering increased soil carbon on‐farm.Here, we develop a mixed methods mapping approach to explore the potential for increasing soil carbon stocks on upland farms in the UK. Our approach considers ecological and social complexity through application of soil science, ecology, participant observation, interviews and a focus group.Our maps revealed landscapes that are full of carbon farming opportunity, but contain previously hidden barriers to the delivery of increased soil carbon. For example, they revealed that carbon farming can be considered by farmers to work in opposition to perceived ‘good farming’ practices and be correlated with increased incidents of livestock disease. We also discovered that the use of maps in research can be problematic as they can close down discussion and exclude local representation of an area.Trialling an interdisciplinary mixed methods approach produced new, deeper and more richly‐textured understandings about how soil carbon management is produced socially as well as ecologically on upland livestock farms. Our findings have potential to improve the success of future carbon farming initiatives by incorporating farmer knowledge and social drivers of implementation.

KW - agri‐environment

KW - climate change

KW - farming

KW - interdisciplinary

KW - local knowledge

KW - mixed methods

KW - qualitative mapping

KW - soil carbon sequestration

KW - soil carbon storage

KW - uplands

U2 - 10.1002/pan3.24

DO - 10.1002/pan3.24

M3 - Journal article

VL - 1

SP - 191

EP - 203

JO - People and Nature

JF - People and Nature

SN - 2575-8314

IS - 2

ER -