Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Habit and the Politics of Social Change

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Habit and the Politics of Social Change: A comparison of nudge theory and pragmatist philosophy

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Habit and the Politics of Social Change: A comparison of nudge theory and pragmatist philosophy. / Pedwell, Carolyn.
In: Body and Society, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 59-94.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Pedwell C. Habit and the Politics of Social Change: A comparison of nudge theory and pragmatist philosophy. Body and Society. 2017 Dec 1;23(4):59-94. Epub 2017 Oct 6. doi: 10.1177/1357034X17734619

Author

Bibtex

@article{84921f8003354c4e85b1fe1863424a0f,
title = "Habit and the Politics of Social Change: A comparison of nudge theory and pragmatist philosophy",
abstract = "Re-thinking the political workings of habit and habituation, this article suggests, is vital to understanding the logics and possibilities of social change today. Any endeavour to explore habit{\textquoteright}s affirmative potential, however, must confront its legacies as a colonialist, imperialist and capitalist technology. As a means to explore what it is that differentiates contemporary neoliberal modes of governing through habit from more critical approaches, this article compares contemporary {\textquoteleft}nudge{\textquoteright} theory and policy, as espoused by the behavioural economist Richard Thaler and the legal scholar Cass Sunstein, with the pragmatist philosophies of habit offered by John Dewey, William James and Shannon Sullivan. While nudge advocates focus on how policy-makers and corporate leaders can intervene in the {\textquoteleft}choice architectures{\textquoteright} that surround us to outsmart or bypass problematic human tendencies, I argue, pragmatist philosophers appreciate the necessity of collective efforts to develop new and flexible forms of habituation in order to engender more enduring and democratic forms of social transformation.",
author = "Carolyn Pedwell",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1357034X17734619",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "59--94",
journal = "Body and Society",
issn = "1357-034X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Habit and the Politics of Social Change

T2 - A comparison of nudge theory and pragmatist philosophy

AU - Pedwell, Carolyn

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Re-thinking the political workings of habit and habituation, this article suggests, is vital to understanding the logics and possibilities of social change today. Any endeavour to explore habit’s affirmative potential, however, must confront its legacies as a colonialist, imperialist and capitalist technology. As a means to explore what it is that differentiates contemporary neoliberal modes of governing through habit from more critical approaches, this article compares contemporary ‘nudge’ theory and policy, as espoused by the behavioural economist Richard Thaler and the legal scholar Cass Sunstein, with the pragmatist philosophies of habit offered by John Dewey, William James and Shannon Sullivan. While nudge advocates focus on how policy-makers and corporate leaders can intervene in the ‘choice architectures’ that surround us to outsmart or bypass problematic human tendencies, I argue, pragmatist philosophers appreciate the necessity of collective efforts to develop new and flexible forms of habituation in order to engender more enduring and democratic forms of social transformation.

AB - Re-thinking the political workings of habit and habituation, this article suggests, is vital to understanding the logics and possibilities of social change today. Any endeavour to explore habit’s affirmative potential, however, must confront its legacies as a colonialist, imperialist and capitalist technology. As a means to explore what it is that differentiates contemporary neoliberal modes of governing through habit from more critical approaches, this article compares contemporary ‘nudge’ theory and policy, as espoused by the behavioural economist Richard Thaler and the legal scholar Cass Sunstein, with the pragmatist philosophies of habit offered by John Dewey, William James and Shannon Sullivan. While nudge advocates focus on how policy-makers and corporate leaders can intervene in the ‘choice architectures’ that surround us to outsmart or bypass problematic human tendencies, I argue, pragmatist philosophers appreciate the necessity of collective efforts to develop new and flexible forms of habituation in order to engender more enduring and democratic forms of social transformation.

U2 - 10.1177/1357034X17734619

DO - 10.1177/1357034X17734619

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 59

EP - 94

JO - Body and Society

JF - Body and Society

SN - 1357-034X

IS - 4

ER -