Final published version, 410 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - Hindi Reading Comprehension
T2 - Do Large Language Models Exhibit Semantic Understanding?
AU - Lal, Daisy Monika
AU - Rayson, Paul
AU - El-Haj, Mo
PY - 2025/1/20
Y1 - 2025/1/20
N2 - In this study, we explore the performance of four advanced Generative AI models—GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Llama3, and HindiGPT, for the Hindi reading comprehension task. Using a zero-shot, instruction-based prompting strategy, we assess model responses through a comprehensive triple evaluation framework using the HindiRC dataset. Our framework combines (1) automatic evaluation using ROUGE, BLEU, BLEURT, METEOR, and Cosine Similarity; (2) rating-based assessments focussing on correctness, comprehension depth, and informativeness; and (3) preference-based selection to identify the best responses. Human ratings indicate that GPT-4 outperforms the other LLMs on all parameters, followed by HindiGPT, GPT-3.5, and then Llama3. Preference-based evaluation similarly placed GPT-4 (80%) as the best model, followed by HindiGPT(74%). However, automatic evaluation showed GPT-4 to be the lowest performer on n-gram metrics, yet the best performer on semantic metrics, suggesting it captures deeper meaning and semantic alignment over direct lexical overlap, which aligns with its strong human evaluation scores. This study also highlights that even though the models mostly address literal factual recall questions with high precision, they still face the challenge of specificity and interpretive bias at times.
AB - In this study, we explore the performance of four advanced Generative AI models—GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Llama3, and HindiGPT, for the Hindi reading comprehension task. Using a zero-shot, instruction-based prompting strategy, we assess model responses through a comprehensive triple evaluation framework using the HindiRC dataset. Our framework combines (1) automatic evaluation using ROUGE, BLEU, BLEURT, METEOR, and Cosine Similarity; (2) rating-based assessments focussing on correctness, comprehension depth, and informativeness; and (3) preference-based selection to identify the best responses. Human ratings indicate that GPT-4 outperforms the other LLMs on all parameters, followed by HindiGPT, GPT-3.5, and then Llama3. Preference-based evaluation similarly placed GPT-4 (80%) as the best model, followed by HindiGPT(74%). However, automatic evaluation showed GPT-4 to be the lowest performer on n-gram metrics, yet the best performer on semantic metrics, suggesting it captures deeper meaning and semantic alignment over direct lexical overlap, which aligns with its strong human evaluation scores. This study also highlights that even though the models mostly address literal factual recall questions with high precision, they still face the challenge of specificity and interpretive bias at times.
M3 - Conference contribution/Paper
SP - 1
EP - 10
BT - Proceedings of the First Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Indo-Aryan and Dravidian Languages
A2 - Weerasinghe, Ruvan
A2 - Anuradha, Isuri
A2 - Sumanathilaka, Deshan
PB - Association for Computational Linguistics
CY - Abu Dhabi
ER -