Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Hit by a perfect storm? 
View graph of relations

Hit by a perfect storm? : Art & Design in the National Student Survey

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Hit by a perfect storm? : Art & Design in the National Student Survey. / Yorke, Mantz; Orr, Susan; Blair, Bernadette .
In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2014, p. 1788-1810.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Yorke, M, Orr, S & Blair, B 2014, 'Hit by a perfect storm? : Art & Design in the National Student Survey', Studies in Higher Education, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1788-1810. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806465

APA

Vancouver

Yorke M, Orr S, Blair B. Hit by a perfect storm? : Art & Design in the National Student Survey. Studies in Higher Education. 2014;39(10):1788-1810. Epub 2014 Jul 24. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.806465

Author

Yorke, Mantz ; Orr, Susan ; Blair, Bernadette . / Hit by a perfect storm?  : Art & Design in the National Student Survey. In: Studies in Higher Education. 2014 ; Vol. 39, No. 10. pp. 1788-1810.

Bibtex

@article{a3b05e4a080746a6aecc6faee84484d7,
title = "Hit by a perfect storm? : Art & Design in the National Student Survey",
abstract = "There has long been the suspicion amongst staff in Art & Design that the ratings given to their subject disciplines in the UK's National Student Survey are adversely affected by a combination of circumstances – a {\textquoteleft}perfect storm{\textquoteright}. The {\textquoteleft}perfect storm{\textquoteright} proposition is tested by comparing ratings for Art & Design with those for a selection of other subjects chosen because they share some features that might lead to lower ratings on the survey. Data from a small-scale qualitative study are used to throw light on what might lie behind the sector-wide statistics. The comparisons suggest that there is some validity in the {\textquoteleft}perfect storm{\textquoteright} proposition. More broadly, the article points to the need for sophistication in interpreting findings from the survey, irrespective of the subject area.",
keywords = "Art & Design, National Student Survey, subject comparisons, quantitative analysis, qualitative data",
author = "Mantz Yorke and Susan Orr and Bernadette Blair",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/03075079.2013.806465",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "1788--1810",
journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
issn = "0307-5079",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hit by a perfect storm? 

T2 - Art & Design in the National Student Survey

AU - Yorke, Mantz

AU - Orr, Susan

AU - Blair, Bernadette

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - There has long been the suspicion amongst staff in Art & Design that the ratings given to their subject disciplines in the UK's National Student Survey are adversely affected by a combination of circumstances – a ‘perfect storm’. The ‘perfect storm’ proposition is tested by comparing ratings for Art & Design with those for a selection of other subjects chosen because they share some features that might lead to lower ratings on the survey. Data from a small-scale qualitative study are used to throw light on what might lie behind the sector-wide statistics. The comparisons suggest that there is some validity in the ‘perfect storm’ proposition. More broadly, the article points to the need for sophistication in interpreting findings from the survey, irrespective of the subject area.

AB - There has long been the suspicion amongst staff in Art & Design that the ratings given to their subject disciplines in the UK's National Student Survey are adversely affected by a combination of circumstances – a ‘perfect storm’. The ‘perfect storm’ proposition is tested by comparing ratings for Art & Design with those for a selection of other subjects chosen because they share some features that might lead to lower ratings on the survey. Data from a small-scale qualitative study are used to throw light on what might lie behind the sector-wide statistics. The comparisons suggest that there is some validity in the ‘perfect storm’ proposition. More broadly, the article points to the need for sophistication in interpreting findings from the survey, irrespective of the subject area.

KW - Art & Design

KW - National Student Survey

KW - subject comparisons

KW - quantitative analysis

KW - qualitative data

U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2013.806465

DO - 10.1080/03075079.2013.806465

M3 - Journal article

VL - 39

SP - 1788

EP - 1810

JO - Studies in Higher Education

JF - Studies in Higher Education

SN - 0307-5079

IS - 10

ER -