Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > "Holders of knowledge are communities, not acad...

Electronic data

  • Manuscript_1

    Accepted author manuscript, 332 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

"Holders of knowledge are communities, not academic institutions": Lessons from involving minoritised older people as co-researchers in a study of loneliness in later life

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

"Holders of knowledge are communities, not academic institutions": Lessons from involving minoritised older people as co-researchers in a study of loneliness in later life. / Cotterell, Natalie; Buffel, Tine.
In: Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 3, 30.09.2023, p. 441-470.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Cotterell N, Buffel T. "Holders of knowledge are communities, not academic institutions": Lessons from involving minoritised older people as co-researchers in a study of loneliness in later life. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2023 Sept 30;20(3):441-470. Epub 2023 Aug 15. doi: 10.1080/14780887.2023.2180463

Author

Bibtex

@article{fb7a2228cb334026ad35772325774f79,
title = "{"}Holders of knowledge are communities, not academic institutions{"}: Lessons from involving minoritised older people as co-researchers in a study of loneliness in later life",
abstract = "A growing body of work suggests that co-research with older adults contributes to a better understanding of later experienced health and social problems. Yet, few studies have involved minoritised older people as co-researchers, and there has been a lack of critical appraisal of challenges encountered in the process. In response, this paper presents lessons from a project which was aimed at co-producing research to explore experiences of loneliness with and by ethnically and sexually minoritised older people (50+) in Greater Manchester (United Kingdom). The paper presents findings based upon field notes and focus groups with ten older co-researchers reflecting on their motivations,roles, and responsibilities. Four themes will be critically assessed: power and privilege; co-research as an extractive process; co-ownership; and time and financial constraints. At the core of this paper is an examination of how the power held by academics shape opportunities for individuals to meaningfully engage in co-research.",
keywords = "Ageing, co-research, older people, older people minoritised groups, participatory approaches",
author = "Natalie Cotterell and Tine Buffel",
year = "2023",
month = sep,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/14780887.2023.2180463",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "441--470",
journal = "Qualitative Research in Psychology",
issn = "1478-0887",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Holders of knowledge are communities, not academic institutions"

T2 - Lessons from involving minoritised older people as co-researchers in a study of loneliness in later life

AU - Cotterell, Natalie

AU - Buffel, Tine

PY - 2023/9/30

Y1 - 2023/9/30

N2 - A growing body of work suggests that co-research with older adults contributes to a better understanding of later experienced health and social problems. Yet, few studies have involved minoritised older people as co-researchers, and there has been a lack of critical appraisal of challenges encountered in the process. In response, this paper presents lessons from a project which was aimed at co-producing research to explore experiences of loneliness with and by ethnically and sexually minoritised older people (50+) in Greater Manchester (United Kingdom). The paper presents findings based upon field notes and focus groups with ten older co-researchers reflecting on their motivations,roles, and responsibilities. Four themes will be critically assessed: power and privilege; co-research as an extractive process; co-ownership; and time and financial constraints. At the core of this paper is an examination of how the power held by academics shape opportunities for individuals to meaningfully engage in co-research.

AB - A growing body of work suggests that co-research with older adults contributes to a better understanding of later experienced health and social problems. Yet, few studies have involved minoritised older people as co-researchers, and there has been a lack of critical appraisal of challenges encountered in the process. In response, this paper presents lessons from a project which was aimed at co-producing research to explore experiences of loneliness with and by ethnically and sexually minoritised older people (50+) in Greater Manchester (United Kingdom). The paper presents findings based upon field notes and focus groups with ten older co-researchers reflecting on their motivations,roles, and responsibilities. Four themes will be critically assessed: power and privilege; co-research as an extractive process; co-ownership; and time and financial constraints. At the core of this paper is an examination of how the power held by academics shape opportunities for individuals to meaningfully engage in co-research.

KW - Ageing

KW - co-research

KW - older people

KW - older people minoritised groups

KW - participatory approaches

U2 - 10.1080/14780887.2023.2180463

DO - 10.1080/14780887.2023.2180463

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 441

EP - 470

JO - Qualitative Research in Psychology

JF - Qualitative Research in Psychology

SN - 1478-0887

IS - 3

ER -