Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Hong Kong anti-human trafficking framework

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Hong Kong anti-human trafficking framework: what lessons can be learned from Europe?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Hong Kong anti-human trafficking framework: what lessons can be learned from Europe? / Lo, Noble Po-kan.
In: Frontiers in Sociology, Vol. 9, 1395907, 11.09.2024.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lo NP. Hong Kong anti-human trafficking framework: what lessons can be learned from Europe? Frontiers in Sociology. 2024 Sept 11;9:1395907. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1395907

Author

Bibtex

@article{17dc4cd9f59045dd9fd0f7baf029c843,
title = "Hong Kong anti-human trafficking framework: what lessons can be learned from Europe?",
abstract = "This article examines the regulatory framework related to human trafficking in Hong Kong and identifies its deficiencies as the lack of an accepted internationally compliant definition of trafficking and the absence of any specific criminal offence of trafficking as a result. The article compares the approach taken in Hong Kong to efforts undertaken in Europe by the Council of Europe, the UK, and the European Union and identifies several lessons from the European experience that could help rectify failures observed in Hong Kong. In particular, effective combatting of human trafficking requires not only a definition of the offence that recognises the essential elements—an “act,” a “means,” and a “purpose” of exploitation—but also the establishment of sufficient state institutions and agencies dedicated to identifying and protecting trafficking victims. Without the detection of trafficking victims, criminals engaged in the act of trafficking perceive their chances of being caught and prosecuted as low and operate with impunity. This necessitates the adoption of a consistent and readily identifiable criminal offence of “trafficking” aligned with the approach taken by the Palermo Protocol, just as the EU and UK have done.",
keywords = "human trafficking; anti-human trafficking framework, Council of Europe, Hong Kong{\textquoteright}s Modern Slavery Bill, European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights",
author = "Lo, {Noble Po-kan}",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "11",
doi = "10.3389/fsoc.2024.1395907",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Frontiers in Sociology",
issn = "2297-7775",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hong Kong anti-human trafficking framework

T2 - what lessons can be learned from Europe?

AU - Lo, Noble Po-kan

PY - 2024/9/11

Y1 - 2024/9/11

N2 - This article examines the regulatory framework related to human trafficking in Hong Kong and identifies its deficiencies as the lack of an accepted internationally compliant definition of trafficking and the absence of any specific criminal offence of trafficking as a result. The article compares the approach taken in Hong Kong to efforts undertaken in Europe by the Council of Europe, the UK, and the European Union and identifies several lessons from the European experience that could help rectify failures observed in Hong Kong. In particular, effective combatting of human trafficking requires not only a definition of the offence that recognises the essential elements—an “act,” a “means,” and a “purpose” of exploitation—but also the establishment of sufficient state institutions and agencies dedicated to identifying and protecting trafficking victims. Without the detection of trafficking victims, criminals engaged in the act of trafficking perceive their chances of being caught and prosecuted as low and operate with impunity. This necessitates the adoption of a consistent and readily identifiable criminal offence of “trafficking” aligned with the approach taken by the Palermo Protocol, just as the EU and UK have done.

AB - This article examines the regulatory framework related to human trafficking in Hong Kong and identifies its deficiencies as the lack of an accepted internationally compliant definition of trafficking and the absence of any specific criminal offence of trafficking as a result. The article compares the approach taken in Hong Kong to efforts undertaken in Europe by the Council of Europe, the UK, and the European Union and identifies several lessons from the European experience that could help rectify failures observed in Hong Kong. In particular, effective combatting of human trafficking requires not only a definition of the offence that recognises the essential elements—an “act,” a “means,” and a “purpose” of exploitation—but also the establishment of sufficient state institutions and agencies dedicated to identifying and protecting trafficking victims. Without the detection of trafficking victims, criminals engaged in the act of trafficking perceive their chances of being caught and prosecuted as low and operate with impunity. This necessitates the adoption of a consistent and readily identifiable criminal offence of “trafficking” aligned with the approach taken by the Palermo Protocol, just as the EU and UK have done.

KW - human trafficking; anti-human trafficking framework

KW - Council of Europe

KW - Hong Kong’s Modern Slavery Bill

KW - European Court of Human Rights

KW - European Convention on Human Rights

U2 - 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1395907

DO - 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1395907

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

JO - Frontiers in Sociology

JF - Frontiers in Sociology

SN - 2297-7775

M1 - 1395907

ER -