Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > How British Men and Women Swear
View graph of relations

How British Men and Women Swear

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

How British Men and Women Swear. / McEnery, Tony.
Language in Use: A Reader. ed. / Patrick Griffiths; Andrew John Merrison; Aileen Bloomer. London: Routledge, 2009. p. 242-256.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

McEnery, T 2009, How British Men and Women Swear. in P Griffiths, AJ Merrison & A Bloomer (eds), Language in Use: A Reader. Routledge, London, pp. 242-256. <https://www.routledge.com/Language-in-Use-A-Reader/Griffiths-Merrison-Bloomer/p/book/9780415442053>

APA

McEnery, T. (2009). How British Men and Women Swear. In P. Griffiths, A. J. Merrison, & A. Bloomer (Eds.), Language in Use: A Reader (pp. 242-256). Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Language-in-Use-A-Reader/Griffiths-Merrison-Bloomer/p/book/9780415442053

Vancouver

McEnery T. How British Men and Women Swear. In Griffiths P, Merrison AJ, Bloomer A, editors, Language in Use: A Reader. London: Routledge. 2009. p. 242-256

Author

McEnery, Tony. / How British Men and Women Swear. Language in Use: A Reader. editor / Patrick Griffiths ; Andrew John Merrison ; Aileen Bloomer. London : Routledge, 2009. pp. 242-256

Bibtex

@inbook{cb25711cfaa84c94883c4c90bb86cd6e,
title = "How British Men and Women Swear",
abstract = "It is still, in the author's opinion, a widely held folk belief in Britain that men swear more often than women. This is not the case. When all of the words in the Lancaster Corpus of Abuse are considered, it is equally likely that bad language will be used by a male as by a female. While Bad Language Words (BLWs) as a set may not differentiate males from females, the frequency of use of individual BLWs clearly does mark males and females apart. The words themselves suggest another way in which males and females may differ. Premodifying intensification and literal usage are also more typical of females than males. Again, neither is linked directly to personal abuse. The typically male usages are also, interestingly, not linked to abuse as such – they are both associated with intensification. For both sexes there is some degree of differentiation of the use of BLWs for targets of different sexes.",
author = "Tony McEnery",
year = "2009",
month = jul,
day = "6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780415442053",
pages = "242--256",
editor = "Griffiths, {Patrick } and Merrison, {Andrew John} and Aileen Bloomer",
booktitle = "Language in Use",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - How British Men and Women Swear

AU - McEnery, Tony

PY - 2009/7/6

Y1 - 2009/7/6

N2 - It is still, in the author's opinion, a widely held folk belief in Britain that men swear more often than women. This is not the case. When all of the words in the Lancaster Corpus of Abuse are considered, it is equally likely that bad language will be used by a male as by a female. While Bad Language Words (BLWs) as a set may not differentiate males from females, the frequency of use of individual BLWs clearly does mark males and females apart. The words themselves suggest another way in which males and females may differ. Premodifying intensification and literal usage are also more typical of females than males. Again, neither is linked directly to personal abuse. The typically male usages are also, interestingly, not linked to abuse as such – they are both associated with intensification. For both sexes there is some degree of differentiation of the use of BLWs for targets of different sexes.

AB - It is still, in the author's opinion, a widely held folk belief in Britain that men swear more often than women. This is not the case. When all of the words in the Lancaster Corpus of Abuse are considered, it is equally likely that bad language will be used by a male as by a female. While Bad Language Words (BLWs) as a set may not differentiate males from females, the frequency of use of individual BLWs clearly does mark males and females apart. The words themselves suggest another way in which males and females may differ. Premodifying intensification and literal usage are also more typical of females than males. Again, neither is linked directly to personal abuse. The typically male usages are also, interestingly, not linked to abuse as such – they are both associated with intensification. For both sexes there is some degree of differentiation of the use of BLWs for targets of different sexes.

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85140547067

SN - 9780415442053

SN - 9780415442046

SP - 242

EP - 256

BT - Language in Use

A2 - Griffiths, Patrick

A2 - Merrison, Andrew John

A2 - Bloomer, Aileen

PB - Routledge

CY - London

ER -