Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > How Good Are My Tests?

Electronic data

  • FullText (1)

    Rights statement: ©2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.

    Accepted author manuscript, 129 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

How Good Are My Tests?

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published
Publication date3/07/2017
Host publication2017 IEEE/ACM 8th Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics (WETSoM)
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
Pages9-14
Number of pages6
ISBN (electronic)9781538628072
<mark>Original language</mark>English
Event8th IEEE/ACM Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics, WETSoM 2017 - Buenos Aires, Argentina
Duration: 23/05/2017 → …

Conference

Conference8th IEEE/ACM Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics, WETSoM 2017
Country/TerritoryArgentina
CityBuenos Aires
Period23/05/17 → …

Publication series

Name2017 IEEE/ACM 8th Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics (WETSoM)
PublisherIEEE
ISSN (Print)2327-0969

Conference

Conference8th IEEE/ACM Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Metrics, WETSoM 2017
Country/TerritoryArgentina
CityBuenos Aires
Period23/05/17 → …

Abstract

Background: Test quality is a prerequisite for achieving production system quality. While the concept of quality is multidimensional, most of the effort in testing context hasbeen channelled towards measuring test effectiveness. Objective: While effectiveness of tests is certainly important, we aim to identify a core list of testing principles that also address other quality facets of testing, and to discuss how they can be quantified as indicators of test quality. Method: We have conducted a two-day workshop with our industry partners to come up with a list of relevant principles and best practices expected to result in high quality tests. We then utilised our academic and industrial training materials together with recommendations in practitioner oriented testing books to refine the list. We surveyed existing literature for potential metrics to quantify identified principles. Results: We have identified a list of 15 testing principles to capture the essence of testing goals and best practices from quality perspective. Eight principles do not map toexisting test smells and we propose metrics for six of those. Further, we have identified additional potential metrics for the seven principles that partially map to test smells. Conclusion: We provide a core list of testing principles along with a discussion of possible ways to quantify them for assessing goodness of tests. We believe that our work would be useful for practitioners in assessing the quality of their tests from multiple perspectives including but not limited to maintainability, comprehension and simplicity.

Bibliographic note

©2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.