Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > How is disability understood? An examination of...
View graph of relations

How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. / Thomas, C. J.
In: Disability and Society, Vol. 19, No. 6, 01.10.2004, p. 569-583.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Thomas CJ. How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability and Society. 2004 Oct 1;19(6):569-583. doi: 10.1080/0968759042000252506

Author

Thomas, C. J. / How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. In: Disability and Society. 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 6. pp. 569-583.

Bibtex

@article{b365f957c8ad4c3492b15bd48c045e88,
title = "How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches.",
abstract = "This paper considers sociological understandings of what constitutes disability. Current meanings of disability in both disability studies and medical sociology are examined and compared, using selected articles from leading authors in each discipline as case studies. These disciplines are often represented as offering starkly contrasting approaches to disability, with their differences amounting to a disciplinary 'divide'. It is argued that, on closer inspection, common ground can be found between some writers in disability studies and medical sociology. It is suggested that this situation has arisen because, in disability studies, the social relational understanding of disability developed by Vic Finkelstein and Paul Hunt in the 1970s has been lost over time, overshadowed by the rise to prominence of its offspring: the social model of disability. The paper concludes with some reflections on the need to revive a social relational understanding of disability.",
author = "Thomas, {C. J.}",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Social Work and Social Policy & Administration",
year = "2004",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0968759042000252506",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "569--583",
journal = "Disability and Society",
issn = "0968-7599",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches.

AU - Thomas, C. J.

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Social Work and Social Policy & Administration

PY - 2004/10/1

Y1 - 2004/10/1

N2 - This paper considers sociological understandings of what constitutes disability. Current meanings of disability in both disability studies and medical sociology are examined and compared, using selected articles from leading authors in each discipline as case studies. These disciplines are often represented as offering starkly contrasting approaches to disability, with their differences amounting to a disciplinary 'divide'. It is argued that, on closer inspection, common ground can be found between some writers in disability studies and medical sociology. It is suggested that this situation has arisen because, in disability studies, the social relational understanding of disability developed by Vic Finkelstein and Paul Hunt in the 1970s has been lost over time, overshadowed by the rise to prominence of its offspring: the social model of disability. The paper concludes with some reflections on the need to revive a social relational understanding of disability.

AB - This paper considers sociological understandings of what constitutes disability. Current meanings of disability in both disability studies and medical sociology are examined and compared, using selected articles from leading authors in each discipline as case studies. These disciplines are often represented as offering starkly contrasting approaches to disability, with their differences amounting to a disciplinary 'divide'. It is argued that, on closer inspection, common ground can be found between some writers in disability studies and medical sociology. It is suggested that this situation has arisen because, in disability studies, the social relational understanding of disability developed by Vic Finkelstein and Paul Hunt in the 1970s has been lost over time, overshadowed by the rise to prominence of its offspring: the social model of disability. The paper concludes with some reflections on the need to revive a social relational understanding of disability.

U2 - 10.1080/0968759042000252506

DO - 10.1080/0968759042000252506

M3 - Journal article

VL - 19

SP - 569

EP - 583

JO - Disability and Society

JF - Disability and Society

SN - 0968-7599

IS - 6

ER -