Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > How successful is errorless learning in support...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

How successful is errorless learning in supporting memory for high and low-level knowledge in dementia?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

How successful is errorless learning in supporting memory for high and low-level knowledge in dementia? / Haslam, C.; Gilroy, D.; Black, S. et al.
In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2006, p. 505-536.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Haslam, C, Gilroy, D, Black, S & Beesley, T 2006, 'How successful is errorless learning in supporting memory for high and low-level knowledge in dementia?', Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 505-536. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010500231867

APA

Vancouver

Haslam C, Gilroy D, Black S, Beesley T. How successful is errorless learning in supporting memory for high and low-level knowledge in dementia? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2006;16(5):505-536. doi: 10.1080/09602010500231867

Author

Haslam, C. ; Gilroy, D. ; Black, S. et al. / How successful is errorless learning in supporting memory for high and low-level knowledge in dementia?. In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2006 ; Vol. 16, No. 5. pp. 505-536.

Bibtex

@article{3f93d60558564324a8aff6d6b7a8abfa,
title = "How successful is errorless learning in supporting memory for high and low-level knowledge in dementia?",
abstract = "Errorless learning has been shown to be very successful in the rehabilitation of memory problems particularly in patients with severe forms of memory impairment. Much of this research has focused on testing knowledge of specific details studied, ignoring any additional, higher-level knowledge that patients may have acquired during the learning process. Hence, it is pertinent to ask whether errorless learning is equally successful in the acquisition of high and low-level knowledge. In this paper, we present results of several studies comparing the effectiveness of errorless and standard trial-and-error methods in acquisition of high and low-level knowledge in people diagnosed with dementia and non-impaired controls. In Study 1, participants were asked to learn novel face–name–occupation associations; and knowledge across a range of levels, from very general (i.e., high-level) to very specific (i.e., low-level), was examined. For patients with probable Alzheimer's disease and controls there was evidence of increased benefit from errorless training in general, but the technique was most beneficial for patients attempting to retrieve specific detail. Study 2 was conducted to address the problem raised by the failure in Study 1 to manipulate learning condition at our highest knowledge level. This novel manipulation was successful, but neither of the patients received the standard benefit from errorless training. Study 3, involving a small group of dementia patients with mixed diagnoses, was conducted to replicate findings from Study 1. Results from the group analysis confirmed that the benefit obtained from errorless learning increased as a function of knowledge specificity, but again several patients failed to show a consistent effect of learning condition. Implications for use of the errorless technique are discussed.",
author = "C. Haslam and D. Gilroy and S. Black and T. Beesley",
note = "cited By 43",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/09602010500231867",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "505--536",
journal = "Neuropsychological Rehabilitation",
issn = "0960-2011",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How successful is errorless learning in supporting memory for high and low-level knowledge in dementia?

AU - Haslam, C.

AU - Gilroy, D.

AU - Black, S.

AU - Beesley, T.

N1 - cited By 43

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Errorless learning has been shown to be very successful in the rehabilitation of memory problems particularly in patients with severe forms of memory impairment. Much of this research has focused on testing knowledge of specific details studied, ignoring any additional, higher-level knowledge that patients may have acquired during the learning process. Hence, it is pertinent to ask whether errorless learning is equally successful in the acquisition of high and low-level knowledge. In this paper, we present results of several studies comparing the effectiveness of errorless and standard trial-and-error methods in acquisition of high and low-level knowledge in people diagnosed with dementia and non-impaired controls. In Study 1, participants were asked to learn novel face–name–occupation associations; and knowledge across a range of levels, from very general (i.e., high-level) to very specific (i.e., low-level), was examined. For patients with probable Alzheimer's disease and controls there was evidence of increased benefit from errorless training in general, but the technique was most beneficial for patients attempting to retrieve specific detail. Study 2 was conducted to address the problem raised by the failure in Study 1 to manipulate learning condition at our highest knowledge level. This novel manipulation was successful, but neither of the patients received the standard benefit from errorless training. Study 3, involving a small group of dementia patients with mixed diagnoses, was conducted to replicate findings from Study 1. Results from the group analysis confirmed that the benefit obtained from errorless learning increased as a function of knowledge specificity, but again several patients failed to show a consistent effect of learning condition. Implications for use of the errorless technique are discussed.

AB - Errorless learning has been shown to be very successful in the rehabilitation of memory problems particularly in patients with severe forms of memory impairment. Much of this research has focused on testing knowledge of specific details studied, ignoring any additional, higher-level knowledge that patients may have acquired during the learning process. Hence, it is pertinent to ask whether errorless learning is equally successful in the acquisition of high and low-level knowledge. In this paper, we present results of several studies comparing the effectiveness of errorless and standard trial-and-error methods in acquisition of high and low-level knowledge in people diagnosed with dementia and non-impaired controls. In Study 1, participants were asked to learn novel face–name–occupation associations; and knowledge across a range of levels, from very general (i.e., high-level) to very specific (i.e., low-level), was examined. For patients with probable Alzheimer's disease and controls there was evidence of increased benefit from errorless training in general, but the technique was most beneficial for patients attempting to retrieve specific detail. Study 2 was conducted to address the problem raised by the failure in Study 1 to manipulate learning condition at our highest knowledge level. This novel manipulation was successful, but neither of the patients received the standard benefit from errorless training. Study 3, involving a small group of dementia patients with mixed diagnoses, was conducted to replicate findings from Study 1. Results from the group analysis confirmed that the benefit obtained from errorless learning increased as a function of knowledge specificity, but again several patients failed to show a consistent effect of learning condition. Implications for use of the errorless technique are discussed.

U2 - 10.1080/09602010500231867

DO - 10.1080/09602010500231867

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 505

EP - 536

JO - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

JF - Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

SN - 0960-2011

IS - 5

ER -