Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Human Values and Digital Work

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Human Values and Digital Work: An Ethnographic Study of Device Paradigm

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Human Values and Digital Work: An Ethnographic Study of Device Paradigm. / Chughtai, Hameed.
In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, Vol. 49, No. 1, 01.02.2020, p. 27-57.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Chughtai H. Human Values and Digital Work: An Ethnographic Study of Device Paradigm. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2020 Feb 1;49(1):27-57. Epub 2019 Jun 14. doi: 10.1177/0891241619855130

Author

Chughtai, Hameed. / Human Values and Digital Work : An Ethnographic Study of Device Paradigm. In: Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2020 ; Vol. 49, No. 1. pp. 27-57.

Bibtex

@article{87fb9c8924724b8a9bd9f7976adc35c4,
title = "Human Values and Digital Work: An Ethnographic Study of Device Paradigm",
abstract = "I examine Albert Borgmann{\textquoteright}s concept of device paradigm as a way to underscore the significance of human values in one{\textquoteright}s engagement with digital work in an organizational setting. Device paradigm explains the pervasive patterns of everyday engagement with information technologies as devices that facilitate prosperity without burden and efforts and, in so doing, can downplay the human values in practices. Although prior research has highlighted the significance of focal things and practices, much remains to be learned about the role of human values in contemporary everyday engagement with digital technologies. Drawing on a critical ethnography of everyday practices at an information technology firm (approximately 300 employees), I apply the critical social theory of Borgmann to analyze how digital work is firmly anchored in human values, and how device paradigm can be used as a critical lens to examine the contemporary everyday engagement with information technology. The study reveals that digital devices can have focal aspects and everyday places can be seen as focal places. Focal things are firmly grounded in focal places, which facilitate the emergence of focal practices. Ethnographers are encouraged to explore values in the field (held by people) as well as values of the field (attached to the places).",
keywords = "critical theory, device paradigm, ethics, focal practices, human values, information systems",
author = "Hameed Chughtai",
year = "2020",
month = feb,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0891241619855130",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "27--57",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary Ethnography",
issn = "0891-2416",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human Values and Digital Work

T2 - An Ethnographic Study of Device Paradigm

AU - Chughtai, Hameed

PY - 2020/2/1

Y1 - 2020/2/1

N2 - I examine Albert Borgmann’s concept of device paradigm as a way to underscore the significance of human values in one’s engagement with digital work in an organizational setting. Device paradigm explains the pervasive patterns of everyday engagement with information technologies as devices that facilitate prosperity without burden and efforts and, in so doing, can downplay the human values in practices. Although prior research has highlighted the significance of focal things and practices, much remains to be learned about the role of human values in contemporary everyday engagement with digital technologies. Drawing on a critical ethnography of everyday practices at an information technology firm (approximately 300 employees), I apply the critical social theory of Borgmann to analyze how digital work is firmly anchored in human values, and how device paradigm can be used as a critical lens to examine the contemporary everyday engagement with information technology. The study reveals that digital devices can have focal aspects and everyday places can be seen as focal places. Focal things are firmly grounded in focal places, which facilitate the emergence of focal practices. Ethnographers are encouraged to explore values in the field (held by people) as well as values of the field (attached to the places).

AB - I examine Albert Borgmann’s concept of device paradigm as a way to underscore the significance of human values in one’s engagement with digital work in an organizational setting. Device paradigm explains the pervasive patterns of everyday engagement with information technologies as devices that facilitate prosperity without burden and efforts and, in so doing, can downplay the human values in practices. Although prior research has highlighted the significance of focal things and practices, much remains to be learned about the role of human values in contemporary everyday engagement with digital technologies. Drawing on a critical ethnography of everyday practices at an information technology firm (approximately 300 employees), I apply the critical social theory of Borgmann to analyze how digital work is firmly anchored in human values, and how device paradigm can be used as a critical lens to examine the contemporary everyday engagement with information technology. The study reveals that digital devices can have focal aspects and everyday places can be seen as focal places. Focal things are firmly grounded in focal places, which facilitate the emergence of focal practices. Ethnographers are encouraged to explore values in the field (held by people) as well as values of the field (attached to the places).

KW - critical theory

KW - device paradigm

KW - ethics

KW - focal practices

KW - human values

KW - information systems

U2 - 10.1177/0891241619855130

DO - 10.1177/0891241619855130

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85067804321

VL - 49

SP - 27

EP - 57

JO - Journal of Contemporary Ethnography

JF - Journal of Contemporary Ethnography

SN - 0891-2416

IS - 1

ER -