Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Humour in healthcare interactions
View graph of relations

Humour in healthcare interactions: a risk worth taking?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Humour in healthcare interactions: a risk worth taking? / McCreaddie, May; Payne, Sheila.
In: Health Expectations, Vol. 17, No. 3, 06.2014, p. 332-344.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

McCreaddie M, Payne S. Humour in healthcare interactions: a risk worth taking? Health Expectations. 2014 Jun;17(3):332-344. Epub 2012 Jan 2. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00758.x

Author

McCreaddie, May ; Payne, Sheila. / Humour in healthcare interactions : a risk worth taking?. In: Health Expectations. 2014 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 332-344.

Bibtex

@article{df7c68266546418db6fac3ad2c459b9e,
title = "Humour in healthcare interactions: a risk worth taking?",
abstract = "Background  Humour is a complex, dynamic phenomenon that mainly occurs in social situations between two or more people. Most humour research reviews rehearsed as opposed to spontaneous humour and rarely review the patients{\textquoteright} perspective.Aim  We explore patients{\textquoteright} perspectives on the use of humour in health care. We discuss the asymmetrical and divergent humour use between patients and clinical nurse specialists and posit nurses{\textquoteright} approaches to risk as a contributing factor.Design  A constructivist grounded theory collated researcher-provoked (interviews, observation, field notes, pre-and post-interaction audio diaries) and non-researcher-provoked data (naturally occurring interactions) over 18 months. This paper is based upon four patient focus groups. A constant comparison approach to data collection and analyses was applied using interpretative and illustrative frameworks that balanced what was {\textquoteleft}known{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}unknown{\textquoteright} about humour.Setting and participants  Patients were recruited from four patient–peer groups. Three audio-taped (n = 20) and one observed focus group interactions (n = 12) were undertaken at the groups{\textquoteright} regular meeting places.Results  Patients hold a broad appreciation of humour and recognize it as being evident in subtle and nuanced forms. Patients wish health-care staff to initiate and reciprocate humour.Conclusion  A chasm exists between what patients apparently want with regard to humour use in health-care interactions and what actually transpires. Initiating humour involves risk, and risk-taking requires a degree of self-esteem and confidence. Nurses are, arguably, risk-averse and have low self-esteem. Future research could review confidence and self-esteem markers with observed humour use in nurses and their interactions across a range of specialities.",
author = "May McCreaddie and Sheila Payne",
year = "2014",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00758.x",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "332--344",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Humour in healthcare interactions

T2 - a risk worth taking?

AU - McCreaddie, May

AU - Payne, Sheila

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - Background  Humour is a complex, dynamic phenomenon that mainly occurs in social situations between two or more people. Most humour research reviews rehearsed as opposed to spontaneous humour and rarely review the patients’ perspective.Aim  We explore patients’ perspectives on the use of humour in health care. We discuss the asymmetrical and divergent humour use between patients and clinical nurse specialists and posit nurses’ approaches to risk as a contributing factor.Design  A constructivist grounded theory collated researcher-provoked (interviews, observation, field notes, pre-and post-interaction audio diaries) and non-researcher-provoked data (naturally occurring interactions) over 18 months. This paper is based upon four patient focus groups. A constant comparison approach to data collection and analyses was applied using interpretative and illustrative frameworks that balanced what was ‘known’ and ‘unknown’ about humour.Setting and participants  Patients were recruited from four patient–peer groups. Three audio-taped (n = 20) and one observed focus group interactions (n = 12) were undertaken at the groups’ regular meeting places.Results  Patients hold a broad appreciation of humour and recognize it as being evident in subtle and nuanced forms. Patients wish health-care staff to initiate and reciprocate humour.Conclusion  A chasm exists between what patients apparently want with regard to humour use in health-care interactions and what actually transpires. Initiating humour involves risk, and risk-taking requires a degree of self-esteem and confidence. Nurses are, arguably, risk-averse and have low self-esteem. Future research could review confidence and self-esteem markers with observed humour use in nurses and their interactions across a range of specialities.

AB - Background  Humour is a complex, dynamic phenomenon that mainly occurs in social situations between two or more people. Most humour research reviews rehearsed as opposed to spontaneous humour and rarely review the patients’ perspective.Aim  We explore patients’ perspectives on the use of humour in health care. We discuss the asymmetrical and divergent humour use between patients and clinical nurse specialists and posit nurses’ approaches to risk as a contributing factor.Design  A constructivist grounded theory collated researcher-provoked (interviews, observation, field notes, pre-and post-interaction audio diaries) and non-researcher-provoked data (naturally occurring interactions) over 18 months. This paper is based upon four patient focus groups. A constant comparison approach to data collection and analyses was applied using interpretative and illustrative frameworks that balanced what was ‘known’ and ‘unknown’ about humour.Setting and participants  Patients were recruited from four patient–peer groups. Three audio-taped (n = 20) and one observed focus group interactions (n = 12) were undertaken at the groups’ regular meeting places.Results  Patients hold a broad appreciation of humour and recognize it as being evident in subtle and nuanced forms. Patients wish health-care staff to initiate and reciprocate humour.Conclusion  A chasm exists between what patients apparently want with regard to humour use in health-care interactions and what actually transpires. Initiating humour involves risk, and risk-taking requires a degree of self-esteem and confidence. Nurses are, arguably, risk-averse and have low self-esteem. Future research could review confidence and self-esteem markers with observed humour use in nurses and their interactions across a range of specialities.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00758.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00758.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 332

EP - 344

JO - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 3

ER -