Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > “I am what I’m not”

Electronic data

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

“I am what I’m not”: A corpus-based study of negative self-identification in UK web forums

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Published

Standard

“I am what I’m not”: A corpus-based study of negative self-identification in UK web forums. / Triebl, Eva.
Lancaster University, 2021. 236 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Triebl E. “I am what I’m not”: A corpus-based study of negative self-identification in UK web forums. Lancaster University, 2021. 236 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/1302

Author

Bibtex

@phdthesis{91abd7bcfc9a498f9df1f2307c95a3a7,
title = "“I am what I{\textquoteright}m not”: A corpus-based study of negative self-identification in UK web forums",
abstract = "This thesis analyses a corpus of 936 instances of the structure “I + copula + NOT + indefinite noun phrase” and its variants, as used in UK web forums. Making assertions about one{\textquoteright}s identity in the negative not only provides information about what one claims not to be, but also indexes various aspects of, and potentially modifies, the interpretation of the textual and non-textual context in which such assertions are used. The thesis develops a theoretical and methodological framework to qualitatively and quantitatively identify the multifunctional, context-dependent meaning potential of the structure in focus. The corpus was qualitatively analysed and tagged for conceptual categories of identifying NPs as well as for formal and functional features of the co-texts in which the structure appears. A conceptual profile of negative self-identifiers was developed, and the experiential meanings of the immediate context of the structure were examined, as were their relations of co-occurrence with particular conceptual categories of negative identifiers. By investigating whether users of English in particular co-texts negate self-identification with noun phrases from particular conceptual domains in patterned ways, the study identified certain conceptualisations that were implicitly acknowledged as relevant for people{\textquoteright}s self-representation in these discourse contexts. Key findings include: (a) negative identification with expertise is a frequent linguistic choice in the context of presenting one{\textquoteright}s knowledge; and (b) negative identification with preferences is a frequent linguistic choice in contexts describing one{\textquoteright}s experience. These findings are discussed in light of the wider sociopolitical context, suggesting an ideological struggle around – and a possible reconceptualisation of – the notion of epistemic authority.",
keywords = "discourse studies, pragmatics, identity, CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS, digital discourse, Corpus-based discourse analysis",
author = "Eva Triebl",
year = "2021",
month = apr,
day = "27",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/1302",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - “I am what I’m not”

T2 - A corpus-based study of negative self-identification in UK web forums

AU - Triebl, Eva

PY - 2021/4/27

Y1 - 2021/4/27

N2 - This thesis analyses a corpus of 936 instances of the structure “I + copula + NOT + indefinite noun phrase” and its variants, as used in UK web forums. Making assertions about one’s identity in the negative not only provides information about what one claims not to be, but also indexes various aspects of, and potentially modifies, the interpretation of the textual and non-textual context in which such assertions are used. The thesis develops a theoretical and methodological framework to qualitatively and quantitatively identify the multifunctional, context-dependent meaning potential of the structure in focus. The corpus was qualitatively analysed and tagged for conceptual categories of identifying NPs as well as for formal and functional features of the co-texts in which the structure appears. A conceptual profile of negative self-identifiers was developed, and the experiential meanings of the immediate context of the structure were examined, as were their relations of co-occurrence with particular conceptual categories of negative identifiers. By investigating whether users of English in particular co-texts negate self-identification with noun phrases from particular conceptual domains in patterned ways, the study identified certain conceptualisations that were implicitly acknowledged as relevant for people’s self-representation in these discourse contexts. Key findings include: (a) negative identification with expertise is a frequent linguistic choice in the context of presenting one’s knowledge; and (b) negative identification with preferences is a frequent linguistic choice in contexts describing one’s experience. These findings are discussed in light of the wider sociopolitical context, suggesting an ideological struggle around – and a possible reconceptualisation of – the notion of epistemic authority.

AB - This thesis analyses a corpus of 936 instances of the structure “I + copula + NOT + indefinite noun phrase” and its variants, as used in UK web forums. Making assertions about one’s identity in the negative not only provides information about what one claims not to be, but also indexes various aspects of, and potentially modifies, the interpretation of the textual and non-textual context in which such assertions are used. The thesis develops a theoretical and methodological framework to qualitatively and quantitatively identify the multifunctional, context-dependent meaning potential of the structure in focus. The corpus was qualitatively analysed and tagged for conceptual categories of identifying NPs as well as for formal and functional features of the co-texts in which the structure appears. A conceptual profile of negative self-identifiers was developed, and the experiential meanings of the immediate context of the structure were examined, as were their relations of co-occurrence with particular conceptual categories of negative identifiers. By investigating whether users of English in particular co-texts negate self-identification with noun phrases from particular conceptual domains in patterned ways, the study identified certain conceptualisations that were implicitly acknowledged as relevant for people’s self-representation in these discourse contexts. Key findings include: (a) negative identification with expertise is a frequent linguistic choice in the context of presenting one’s knowledge; and (b) negative identification with preferences is a frequent linguistic choice in contexts describing one’s experience. These findings are discussed in light of the wider sociopolitical context, suggesting an ideological struggle around – and a possible reconceptualisation of – the notion of epistemic authority.

KW - discourse studies

KW - pragmatics

KW - identity

KW - CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

KW - digital discourse

KW - Corpus-based discourse analysis

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/1302

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/1302

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -