Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Identifying Nontransitive Preferences

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Identifying Nontransitive Preferences

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Identifying Nontransitive Preferences. / Alos Ferrer, Carlos; Fehr, Ernst; Garagnani, Michele .
Zurich: Department of Economics, University of Zurich, 2024. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Alos Ferrer, C, Fehr, E & Garagnani, M 2024 'Identifying Nontransitive Preferences' Economics Working Papers Series, Department of Economics, University of Zurich, Zurich. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-219280

APA

Alos Ferrer, C., Fehr, E., & Garagnani, M. (2024). Identifying Nontransitive Preferences. (Economics Working Papers Series). Department of Economics, University of Zurich. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-219280

Vancouver

Alos Ferrer C, Fehr E, Garagnani M. Identifying Nontransitive Preferences. Zurich: Department of Economics, University of Zurich. 2024 Jun 30. (Economics Working Papers Series). doi: 10.5167/uzh-219280

Author

Alos Ferrer, Carlos ; Fehr, Ernst ; Garagnani, Michele . / Identifying Nontransitive Preferences. Zurich : Department of Economics, University of Zurich, 2024. (Economics Working Papers Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{fc6dceb4c5404e5f890c9bb6fe536fc6,
title = "Identifying Nontransitive Preferences",
abstract = "Transitivity is perhaps the most fundamental axiom in economic models of choice. The empirical literature has regularly documented violations of transitivity, but these violations pose little problem if they are simply a result of somewhat-noisy decision making and not a reflection of the deterministic part of individuals{\textquoteright} preferences. However, what if transitivity violations reflect genuinely nontransitive preferences? And how can we separate nontransitive preferences from noise-generated transitivity violations–a problem that so far appears unresolved? To tackle these fundamental questions, we develop a theoretical framework which allows for nontransitive choices and behavioral noise. We then derive a non-parametric method which uses response times and choice frequencies to distinguish genuine (and potentially nontransitive) preferences from noise. We apply this method to two different datasets, demonstrating that a substantial proportion of transitivity violations reflect genuinely nontransitive preferences. These violations cannot be accounted for by any model using transitive preferences and noisy choices. ",
keywords = "Transitivity, Stochastic choice, Preference Revelation",
author = "{Alos Ferrer}, Carlos and Ernst Fehr and Michele Garagnani",
year = "2024",
month = jun,
day = "30",
doi = "10.5167/uzh-219280",
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Papers Series",
publisher = "Department of Economics, University of Zurich",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Department of Economics, University of Zurich",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Identifying Nontransitive Preferences

AU - Alos Ferrer, Carlos

AU - Fehr, Ernst

AU - Garagnani, Michele

PY - 2024/6/30

Y1 - 2024/6/30

N2 - Transitivity is perhaps the most fundamental axiom in economic models of choice. The empirical literature has regularly documented violations of transitivity, but these violations pose little problem if they are simply a result of somewhat-noisy decision making and not a reflection of the deterministic part of individuals’ preferences. However, what if transitivity violations reflect genuinely nontransitive preferences? And how can we separate nontransitive preferences from noise-generated transitivity violations–a problem that so far appears unresolved? To tackle these fundamental questions, we develop a theoretical framework which allows for nontransitive choices and behavioral noise. We then derive a non-parametric method which uses response times and choice frequencies to distinguish genuine (and potentially nontransitive) preferences from noise. We apply this method to two different datasets, demonstrating that a substantial proportion of transitivity violations reflect genuinely nontransitive preferences. These violations cannot be accounted for by any model using transitive preferences and noisy choices.

AB - Transitivity is perhaps the most fundamental axiom in economic models of choice. The empirical literature has regularly documented violations of transitivity, but these violations pose little problem if they are simply a result of somewhat-noisy decision making and not a reflection of the deterministic part of individuals’ preferences. However, what if transitivity violations reflect genuinely nontransitive preferences? And how can we separate nontransitive preferences from noise-generated transitivity violations–a problem that so far appears unresolved? To tackle these fundamental questions, we develop a theoretical framework which allows for nontransitive choices and behavioral noise. We then derive a non-parametric method which uses response times and choice frequencies to distinguish genuine (and potentially nontransitive) preferences from noise. We apply this method to two different datasets, demonstrating that a substantial proportion of transitivity violations reflect genuinely nontransitive preferences. These violations cannot be accounted for by any model using transitive preferences and noisy choices.

KW - Transitivity

KW - Stochastic choice

KW - Preference Revelation

U2 - 10.5167/uzh-219280

DO - 10.5167/uzh-219280

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Papers Series

BT - Identifying Nontransitive Preferences

PB - Department of Economics, University of Zurich

CY - Zurich

ER -