Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Identifying relevant studies in software engine...
View graph of relations

Identifying relevant studies in software engineering

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Identifying relevant studies in software engineering. / Zhang, He; Ali Babar, Muhammad; Tell, Paolo.
In: Information and Software Technology, Vol. 53, No. 6, 06.2011, p. 625-637.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Zhang, H, Ali Babar, M & Tell, P 2011, 'Identifying relevant studies in software engineering', Information and Software Technology, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 625-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.010

APA

Zhang, H., Ali Babar, M., & Tell, P. (2011). Identifying relevant studies in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 53(6), 625-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.010

Vancouver

Zhang H, Ali Babar M, Tell P. Identifying relevant studies in software engineering. Information and Software Technology. 2011 Jun;53(6):625-637. doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.010

Author

Zhang, He ; Ali Babar, Muhammad ; Tell, Paolo. / Identifying relevant studies in software engineering. In: Information and Software Technology. 2011 ; Vol. 53, No. 6. pp. 625-637.

Bibtex

@article{eead6060b1b14c41ba706f2efe5fadab,
title = "Identifying relevant studies in software engineering",
abstract = "ContextSystematic literature review (SLR) has become an important research methodology in software engineering since the introduction of evidence-based software engineering (EBSE) in 2004. One critical step in applying this methodology is to design and execute appropriate and effective search strategy. This is a time-consuming and error-prone step, which needs to be carefully planned and implemented. There is an apparent need for a systematic approach to designing, executing, and evaluating a suitable search strategy for optimally retrieving the target literature from digital libraries.ObjectiveThe main objective of the research reported in this paper is to improve the search step of undertaking SLRs in software engineering (SE) by devising and evaluating systematic and practical approaches to identifying relevant studies in SE.MethodWe have systematically selected and analytically studied a large number of papers (SLRs) to understand the state-of-the-practice of search strategies in EBSE. Having identified the limitations of the current ad-hoc nature of search strategies used by SE researchers for SLRs, we have devised a systematic and evidence-based approach to developing and executing optimal search strategies in SLRs. The proposed approach incorporates the concept of {\textquoteleft}quasi-gold standard{\textquoteright} (QGS), which consists of collection of known studies, and corresponding {\textquoteleft}quasi-sensitivity{\textquoteright} into the search process for evaluating search performance.ResultsWe conducted two participant–observer case studies to demonstrate and evaluate the adoption of the proposed QGS-based systematic search approach in support of SLRs in SE research.ConclusionWe report their findings based on the case studies that the approach is able to improve the rigor of search process in an SLR, as well as it can serve as a supplement to the guidelines for SLRs in EBSE. We plan to further evaluate the proposed approach using a series of case studies on varying research topics in SE.",
keywords = "search strategy, quasi-gold standard, Systematic Literature Review, evidence-based software engineering",
author = "He Zhang and {Ali Babar}, Muhammad and Paolo Tell",
year = "2011",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.010",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "625--637",
journal = "Information and Software Technology",
issn = "0950-5849",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying relevant studies in software engineering

AU - Zhang, He

AU - Ali Babar, Muhammad

AU - Tell, Paolo

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - ContextSystematic literature review (SLR) has become an important research methodology in software engineering since the introduction of evidence-based software engineering (EBSE) in 2004. One critical step in applying this methodology is to design and execute appropriate and effective search strategy. This is a time-consuming and error-prone step, which needs to be carefully planned and implemented. There is an apparent need for a systematic approach to designing, executing, and evaluating a suitable search strategy for optimally retrieving the target literature from digital libraries.ObjectiveThe main objective of the research reported in this paper is to improve the search step of undertaking SLRs in software engineering (SE) by devising and evaluating systematic and practical approaches to identifying relevant studies in SE.MethodWe have systematically selected and analytically studied a large number of papers (SLRs) to understand the state-of-the-practice of search strategies in EBSE. Having identified the limitations of the current ad-hoc nature of search strategies used by SE researchers for SLRs, we have devised a systematic and evidence-based approach to developing and executing optimal search strategies in SLRs. The proposed approach incorporates the concept of ‘quasi-gold standard’ (QGS), which consists of collection of known studies, and corresponding ‘quasi-sensitivity’ into the search process for evaluating search performance.ResultsWe conducted two participant–observer case studies to demonstrate and evaluate the adoption of the proposed QGS-based systematic search approach in support of SLRs in SE research.ConclusionWe report their findings based on the case studies that the approach is able to improve the rigor of search process in an SLR, as well as it can serve as a supplement to the guidelines for SLRs in EBSE. We plan to further evaluate the proposed approach using a series of case studies on varying research topics in SE.

AB - ContextSystematic literature review (SLR) has become an important research methodology in software engineering since the introduction of evidence-based software engineering (EBSE) in 2004. One critical step in applying this methodology is to design and execute appropriate and effective search strategy. This is a time-consuming and error-prone step, which needs to be carefully planned and implemented. There is an apparent need for a systematic approach to designing, executing, and evaluating a suitable search strategy for optimally retrieving the target literature from digital libraries.ObjectiveThe main objective of the research reported in this paper is to improve the search step of undertaking SLRs in software engineering (SE) by devising and evaluating systematic and practical approaches to identifying relevant studies in SE.MethodWe have systematically selected and analytically studied a large number of papers (SLRs) to understand the state-of-the-practice of search strategies in EBSE. Having identified the limitations of the current ad-hoc nature of search strategies used by SE researchers for SLRs, we have devised a systematic and evidence-based approach to developing and executing optimal search strategies in SLRs. The proposed approach incorporates the concept of ‘quasi-gold standard’ (QGS), which consists of collection of known studies, and corresponding ‘quasi-sensitivity’ into the search process for evaluating search performance.ResultsWe conducted two participant–observer case studies to demonstrate and evaluate the adoption of the proposed QGS-based systematic search approach in support of SLRs in SE research.ConclusionWe report their findings based on the case studies that the approach is able to improve the rigor of search process in an SLR, as well as it can serve as a supplement to the guidelines for SLRs in EBSE. We plan to further evaluate the proposed approach using a series of case studies on varying research topics in SE.

KW - search strategy

KW - quasi-gold standard

KW - Systematic Literature Review

KW - evidence-based software engineering

U2 - 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.010

DO - 10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.010

M3 - Journal article

VL - 53

SP - 625

EP - 637

JO - Information and Software Technology

JF - Information and Software Technology

SN - 0950-5849

IS - 6

ER -