Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > IDENTITY WORK AND PEDAGOGY

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

IDENTITY WORK AND PEDAGOGY: REVISITING GEORGE HERBERT MEAD AS A VEHICLE FOR CRITICAL MANAGEMENT EDUCATION AND LEARNING

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

IDENTITY WORK AND PEDAGOGY: REVISITING GEORGE HERBERT MEAD AS A VEHICLE FOR CRITICAL MANAGEMENT EDUCATION AND LEARNING. / HUBER, GUY; Knights, David.
In: Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 21, No. 2, 01.06.2022, p. 303-317.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

HUBER GUY, Knights D. IDENTITY WORK AND PEDAGOGY: REVISITING GEORGE HERBERT MEAD AS A VEHICLE FOR CRITICAL MANAGEMENT EDUCATION AND LEARNING. Academy of Management Learning and Education. 2022 Jun 1;21(2):303-317. doi: 10.5465/amle.2020.0212

Author

HUBER, GUY ; Knights, David. / IDENTITY WORK AND PEDAGOGY : REVISITING GEORGE HERBERT MEAD AS A VEHICLE FOR CRITICAL MANAGEMENT EDUCATION AND LEARNING. In: Academy of Management Learning and Education. 2022 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 303-317.

Bibtex

@article{7034ca5f881743e998de45003c2f5025,
title = "IDENTITY WORK AND PEDAGOGY: REVISITING GEORGE HERBERT MEAD AS A VEHICLE FOR CRITICAL MANAGEMENT EDUCATION AND LEARNING",
abstract = "While identity has become an excessive preoccupation of people in everyday life, its centrality to critical management learning and education has sometimes been ignored. In this essay, we explore the strengths and limitations but also the neglect of George Herbert Mead's analysis of self and identity for developing a pedagogy that facilitates critical management learning. Through a sociology of knowledge, we trace this neglect to earlier research wherein, with limited exceptions, Marxian inspired critical research tended to eschew a concern with processes of the self-formation of subjects. We argue that Mead's ideas on reflexivity and indeterminacy are central to learning to think differently, which is the benchmark for teaching from a critical management perspective. Drawing on Michel Foucault's ideas, we theorize identity work in the context of power/knowledge relations in ways that help us to transform our pedagogy. Overall, we seek to challenge not only our students but also ourselves in reflecting on identity work to facilitate ways of thinking and feeling differently in teaching and learning.",
author = "GUY HUBER and David Knights",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 George Washington University. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amle.2020.0212",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "303--317",
journal = "Academy of Management Learning and Education",
issn = "1537-260X",
publisher = "George Washington University",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - IDENTITY WORK AND PEDAGOGY

T2 - REVISITING GEORGE HERBERT MEAD AS A VEHICLE FOR CRITICAL MANAGEMENT EDUCATION AND LEARNING

AU - HUBER, GUY

AU - Knights, David

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 George Washington University. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/6/1

Y1 - 2022/6/1

N2 - While identity has become an excessive preoccupation of people in everyday life, its centrality to critical management learning and education has sometimes been ignored. In this essay, we explore the strengths and limitations but also the neglect of George Herbert Mead's analysis of self and identity for developing a pedagogy that facilitates critical management learning. Through a sociology of knowledge, we trace this neglect to earlier research wherein, with limited exceptions, Marxian inspired critical research tended to eschew a concern with processes of the self-formation of subjects. We argue that Mead's ideas on reflexivity and indeterminacy are central to learning to think differently, which is the benchmark for teaching from a critical management perspective. Drawing on Michel Foucault's ideas, we theorize identity work in the context of power/knowledge relations in ways that help us to transform our pedagogy. Overall, we seek to challenge not only our students but also ourselves in reflecting on identity work to facilitate ways of thinking and feeling differently in teaching and learning.

AB - While identity has become an excessive preoccupation of people in everyday life, its centrality to critical management learning and education has sometimes been ignored. In this essay, we explore the strengths and limitations but also the neglect of George Herbert Mead's analysis of self and identity for developing a pedagogy that facilitates critical management learning. Through a sociology of knowledge, we trace this neglect to earlier research wherein, with limited exceptions, Marxian inspired critical research tended to eschew a concern with processes of the self-formation of subjects. We argue that Mead's ideas on reflexivity and indeterminacy are central to learning to think differently, which is the benchmark for teaching from a critical management perspective. Drawing on Michel Foucault's ideas, we theorize identity work in the context of power/knowledge relations in ways that help us to transform our pedagogy. Overall, we seek to challenge not only our students but also ourselves in reflecting on identity work to facilitate ways of thinking and feeling differently in teaching and learning.

U2 - 10.5465/amle.2020.0212

DO - 10.5465/amle.2020.0212

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85134522707

VL - 21

SP - 303

EP - 317

JO - Academy of Management Learning and Education

JF - Academy of Management Learning and Education

SN - 1537-260X

IS - 2

ER -