Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Imagining the soul

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Imagining the soul: Thomas Willis (1621–1675) on the anatomy of the brain and nerves

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Imagining the soul : Thomas Willis (1621–1675) on the anatomy of the brain and nerves. / Wragge-Morley, Alexander.

Progress in Brain Research. Vol. 243 Elsevier, 2018. p. 55-73 (Progress in Brain Research; Vol. 243).

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Wragge-Morley, A 2018, Imagining the soul: Thomas Willis (1621–1675) on the anatomy of the brain and nerves. in Progress in Brain Research. vol. 243, Progress in Brain Research, vol. 243, Elsevier, pp. 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.10.009

APA

Wragge-Morley, A. (2018). Imagining the soul: Thomas Willis (1621–1675) on the anatomy of the brain and nerves. In Progress in Brain Research (Vol. 243, pp. 55-73). (Progress in Brain Research; Vol. 243). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.10.009

Vancouver

Wragge-Morley A. Imagining the soul: Thomas Willis (1621–1675) on the anatomy of the brain and nerves. In Progress in Brain Research. Vol. 243. Elsevier. 2018. p. 55-73. (Progress in Brain Research). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.10.009

Author

Wragge-Morley, Alexander. / Imagining the soul : Thomas Willis (1621–1675) on the anatomy of the brain and nerves. Progress in Brain Research. Vol. 243 Elsevier, 2018. pp. 55-73 (Progress in Brain Research).

Bibtex

@inbook{505ebd7667884705948f91a9e2a17092,
title = "Imagining the soul: Thomas Willis (1621–1675) on the anatomy of the brain and nerves",
abstract = "During the 1660s and 1670s, Thomas Willis (1621–1675) pursued an ambitious program of brain science. Instead of the speculative approach favored by Ren{\'e} Descartes (1596–1659), Willis used comparative anatomy to figure out the workings of the brain and nerves. As a result, Willis is still cited by science writers as the “founder” of the modern neurosciences.This chapter, by contrast, builds on a wealth of scholarship showing that Willis in fact had aims that few scientists would recognize. One of his key objectives, for instance, was to work out how much influence the immaterial, immortal soul had over the mechanisms of the human body. Despite his empiricism, moreover, Willis relied to a large extent on the imagination in his efforts to hypothesize mechanisms for complex cognitive and neurological processes.For the most part, scholars have argued that Willis used such strategies because of an unfortunate tendency to frame hypotheses even when the evidence was lacking. In this chapter, however, I show that the imagination played a surprisingly important role in the neurosciences of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, thereby challenging modern assumptions about the shape and causes of progress in brain research.",
author = "Alexander Wragge-Morley",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.10.009",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780128142578",
volume = "243",
series = "Progress in Brain Research",
publisher = "Elsevier",
pages = "55--73",
booktitle = "Progress in Brain Research",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Imagining the soul

T2 - Thomas Willis (1621–1675) on the anatomy of the brain and nerves

AU - Wragge-Morley, Alexander

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - During the 1660s and 1670s, Thomas Willis (1621–1675) pursued an ambitious program of brain science. Instead of the speculative approach favored by René Descartes (1596–1659), Willis used comparative anatomy to figure out the workings of the brain and nerves. As a result, Willis is still cited by science writers as the “founder” of the modern neurosciences.This chapter, by contrast, builds on a wealth of scholarship showing that Willis in fact had aims that few scientists would recognize. One of his key objectives, for instance, was to work out how much influence the immaterial, immortal soul had over the mechanisms of the human body. Despite his empiricism, moreover, Willis relied to a large extent on the imagination in his efforts to hypothesize mechanisms for complex cognitive and neurological processes.For the most part, scholars have argued that Willis used such strategies because of an unfortunate tendency to frame hypotheses even when the evidence was lacking. In this chapter, however, I show that the imagination played a surprisingly important role in the neurosciences of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, thereby challenging modern assumptions about the shape and causes of progress in brain research.

AB - During the 1660s and 1670s, Thomas Willis (1621–1675) pursued an ambitious program of brain science. Instead of the speculative approach favored by René Descartes (1596–1659), Willis used comparative anatomy to figure out the workings of the brain and nerves. As a result, Willis is still cited by science writers as the “founder” of the modern neurosciences.This chapter, by contrast, builds on a wealth of scholarship showing that Willis in fact had aims that few scientists would recognize. One of his key objectives, for instance, was to work out how much influence the immaterial, immortal soul had over the mechanisms of the human body. Despite his empiricism, moreover, Willis relied to a large extent on the imagination in his efforts to hypothesize mechanisms for complex cognitive and neurological processes.For the most part, scholars have argued that Willis used such strategies because of an unfortunate tendency to frame hypotheses even when the evidence was lacking. In this chapter, however, I show that the imagination played a surprisingly important role in the neurosciences of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, thereby challenging modern assumptions about the shape and causes of progress in brain research.

U2 - 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.10.009

DO - 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.10.009

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780128142578

VL - 243

T3 - Progress in Brain Research

SP - 55

EP - 73

BT - Progress in Brain Research

PB - Elsevier

ER -