Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Imitation and observational learning of hand actions: Prefrontal involvement and connectivity. / Higuchi, Satomi; Holle, Henning; Roberts, Neil et al.
In: NeuroImage, Vol. 59, No. 2, 01.2012, p. 1668-1683.Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Imitation and observational learning of hand actions: Prefrontal involvement and connectivity.
AU - Higuchi, Satomi
AU - Holle, Henning
AU - Roberts, Neil
AU - Eickhoff, Simon B.
AU - Vogt, Stefan
PY - 2012/1
Y1 - 2012/1
N2 - The first aim of this event-related fMRI study was to identify the neural circuits involved in imitation learning. We used a rapid imitation taskwhere participants directly imitated pictures of guitar chords. The results provide clear evidence for the involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, as well as the fronto-parietal mirror circuit (FPMC) during action imitation when the requirements for working memory are low. Connectivity analyses further indicated a robust connectivity between left prefrontal cortex and the components of the FPMC bilaterally. We conclude that a mechanismof automatic perception–action matching alone is insufficient to account for imitation learning. Rather, the motor representation of an observed, complex action, as provided by the FPMC, only serves as the ‘raw material’ for higher-order supervisory and monitoring operations associated with the prefrontal cortex. The second aim of this study was to assess whether these neural circuits are also recruited during observational practice (OP, without motor execution), or only during physical practice (PP). Whereas prefrontal cortex was not consistently activated in action observation across all participants, prefrontal activation intensities did predict the behavioural practice effects, thus indicating a crucial role of prefrontal cortex also in OP. In addition, whilst OP and PP produced similar activation intensities in the FPMC when assessed during action observation, during imitative execution, the practice-related activation decreases were significantly more pronounced for PP than for OP. This dissociation indicates a lack of execution-related resources in observationally practised actions. More specifically, we found neural efficiency effects in the right motor cingulate–basal ganglia circuit and the FPMC that were only observed after PP but not after OP. Finally, we confirmed that practice generally induced activation decreases in the FPMC during both action observation and imitation sessions and outline a framework explaining the discrepant findings in the literature.
AB - The first aim of this event-related fMRI study was to identify the neural circuits involved in imitation learning. We used a rapid imitation taskwhere participants directly imitated pictures of guitar chords. The results provide clear evidence for the involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, as well as the fronto-parietal mirror circuit (FPMC) during action imitation when the requirements for working memory are low. Connectivity analyses further indicated a robust connectivity between left prefrontal cortex and the components of the FPMC bilaterally. We conclude that a mechanismof automatic perception–action matching alone is insufficient to account for imitation learning. Rather, the motor representation of an observed, complex action, as provided by the FPMC, only serves as the ‘raw material’ for higher-order supervisory and monitoring operations associated with the prefrontal cortex. The second aim of this study was to assess whether these neural circuits are also recruited during observational practice (OP, without motor execution), or only during physical practice (PP). Whereas prefrontal cortex was not consistently activated in action observation across all participants, prefrontal activation intensities did predict the behavioural practice effects, thus indicating a crucial role of prefrontal cortex also in OP. In addition, whilst OP and PP produced similar activation intensities in the FPMC when assessed during action observation, during imitative execution, the practice-related activation decreases were significantly more pronounced for PP than for OP. This dissociation indicates a lack of execution-related resources in observationally practised actions. More specifically, we found neural efficiency effects in the right motor cingulate–basal ganglia circuit and the FPMC that were only observed after PP but not after OP. Finally, we confirmed that practice generally induced activation decreases in the FPMC during both action observation and imitation sessions and outline a framework explaining the discrepant findings in the literature.
KW - Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
KW - Mirror neuron system
KW - Imitation learning
KW - Action observation
KW - Neural efficiency
KW - Connectivity analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83055180690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.021
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.021
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:83055180690
VL - 59
SP - 1668
EP - 1683
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
SN - 1053-8119
IS - 2
ER -