Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Impairment, disability and loss: reassessing th...
View graph of relations

Impairment, disability and loss: reassessing the rejection of loss.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Impairment, disability and loss: reassessing the rejection of loss. / Sapey, Bob J.
In: Illness, Crisis and Loss, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 90-101.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Sapey BJ. Impairment, disability and loss: reassessing the rejection of loss. Illness, Crisis and Loss. 2004 Jan;12(1):90-101. doi: 10.1177/1054137303259738

Author

Sapey, Bob J. / Impairment, disability and loss: reassessing the rejection of loss. In: Illness, Crisis and Loss. 2004 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 90-101.

Bibtex

@article{6e04a3720d8a4e3fa7c44999637f5bf5,
title = "Impairment, disability and loss: reassessing the rejection of loss.",
abstract = "Psychological theories of loss and grief, which suggest that people must go through stages such as shock, anger, denial, and despair before finally reaching a recovered stage of acceptance, have often been applied to understanding the experience of disability. However, this has also been firmly rejected within the U.K. disability studies literature, which draws on the experience of disabled people from a critical perspective. The result is not just a rejection of ways of understanding loss but a high level of caution in exploring disability from a psychological perspective. This article explores these debates and then considers if more recent theorizing about loss and grief has in any way addressed these criticisms. The disenfranchised grief, dual process, and meaning reconstruction models are each considered and questions are raised about their potential to contribute to disability studies.",
keywords = "disabled people, social model, loss, grief",
author = "Sapey, {Bob J.}",
note = "RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Social Work and Social Policy & Administration",
year = "2004",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1177/1054137303259738",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "90--101",
journal = "Illness, Crisis and Loss",
issn = "1054-1373",
publisher = "Baywood Publishing Co. Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impairment, disability and loss: reassessing the rejection of loss.

AU - Sapey, Bob J.

N1 - RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Social Work and Social Policy & Administration

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Psychological theories of loss and grief, which suggest that people must go through stages such as shock, anger, denial, and despair before finally reaching a recovered stage of acceptance, have often been applied to understanding the experience of disability. However, this has also been firmly rejected within the U.K. disability studies literature, which draws on the experience of disabled people from a critical perspective. The result is not just a rejection of ways of understanding loss but a high level of caution in exploring disability from a psychological perspective. This article explores these debates and then considers if more recent theorizing about loss and grief has in any way addressed these criticisms. The disenfranchised grief, dual process, and meaning reconstruction models are each considered and questions are raised about their potential to contribute to disability studies.

AB - Psychological theories of loss and grief, which suggest that people must go through stages such as shock, anger, denial, and despair before finally reaching a recovered stage of acceptance, have often been applied to understanding the experience of disability. However, this has also been firmly rejected within the U.K. disability studies literature, which draws on the experience of disabled people from a critical perspective. The result is not just a rejection of ways of understanding loss but a high level of caution in exploring disability from a psychological perspective. This article explores these debates and then considers if more recent theorizing about loss and grief has in any way addressed these criticisms. The disenfranchised grief, dual process, and meaning reconstruction models are each considered and questions are raised about their potential to contribute to disability studies.

KW - disabled people

KW - social model

KW - loss

KW - grief

U2 - 10.1177/1054137303259738

DO - 10.1177/1054137303259738

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 90

EP - 101

JO - Illness, Crisis and Loss

JF - Illness, Crisis and Loss

SN - 1054-1373

IS - 1

ER -