Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Implementing an Organisational Intervention for...

Electronic data

  • 11003492.pdf

    Final published version, 15.9 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-ND

View graph of relations

Implementing an Organisational Intervention for Work-related Stress : An Action Research Study.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Unpublished

Standard

Implementing an Organisational Intervention for Work-related Stress : An Action Research Study. / Hamilton, John E.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2016. 429 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Hamilton, J. E. (2016). Implementing an Organisational Intervention for Work-related Stress : An Action Research Study. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University.

Vancouver

Author

Hamilton, John E. / Implementing an Organisational Intervention for Work-related Stress : An Action Research Study.. Lancaster : Lancaster University, 2016. 429 p.

Bibtex

@phdthesis{d0c96838029244adaacac7773af67ff3,
title = "Implementing an Organisational Intervention for Work-related Stress : An Action Research Study.",
abstract = "This thesis describes an action research study assessing the effectiveness of an organisational intervention for work-related stress incorporating participatory principles. The study, set in the call centre business of a UK utilities company, aimed to contribute evidence of the effectiveness of the HSE Management Standards approach in managing work-related stress. The study developed and utilised a two-stage action research framework that guided the research and intervention design and informed the choice of the research methodology. This approach, comprising macro and micro intervention cycles, collected research data at three intervals over the 12-month timeline. The study deployed mixed methods using process evaluation principles with intervention (n=185) and control groups (n=205). The intervention comprised a stress risk assessment based on the Management Standards, delivered to the intervention group through management training. The results showed that the intervention did not reduce employee work-related stress or improve their psychological wellbeing. The process evaluation indicated that the intervention failed to translate an initial change in attitudes, values and knowledge into meaningful changes in psychosocial working conditions. Exposure to non-work stressors was found to be three times more influential on psychological wellbeing than work stressors, with social support from managers having a protective influence on both work-related stress and psychological wellbeing. The study identified the challenges of implementing an organisational intervention for stress in a dynamic, change-affected working environment with high employee turnover, where the inherent nature of the work inhibits the formation of social support networks. Despite the perceived stressful nature of this setting, the study identified that non-work stressors had a predominant influence on psychological wellbeing. The identification of the importance of social support from managers aligns with findings from previous studies, with this study differentiating between personal support and work support, and the importance of a manager's work knowledge, availability and visibility.",
keywords = "MiAaPQ, Management., Occupational psychology.",
author = "Hamilton, {John E}",
note = "Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2016.",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Implementing an Organisational Intervention for Work-related Stress : An Action Research Study.

AU - Hamilton, John E

N1 - Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2016.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This thesis describes an action research study assessing the effectiveness of an organisational intervention for work-related stress incorporating participatory principles. The study, set in the call centre business of a UK utilities company, aimed to contribute evidence of the effectiveness of the HSE Management Standards approach in managing work-related stress. The study developed and utilised a two-stage action research framework that guided the research and intervention design and informed the choice of the research methodology. This approach, comprising macro and micro intervention cycles, collected research data at three intervals over the 12-month timeline. The study deployed mixed methods using process evaluation principles with intervention (n=185) and control groups (n=205). The intervention comprised a stress risk assessment based on the Management Standards, delivered to the intervention group through management training. The results showed that the intervention did not reduce employee work-related stress or improve their psychological wellbeing. The process evaluation indicated that the intervention failed to translate an initial change in attitudes, values and knowledge into meaningful changes in psychosocial working conditions. Exposure to non-work stressors was found to be three times more influential on psychological wellbeing than work stressors, with social support from managers having a protective influence on both work-related stress and psychological wellbeing. The study identified the challenges of implementing an organisational intervention for stress in a dynamic, change-affected working environment with high employee turnover, where the inherent nature of the work inhibits the formation of social support networks. Despite the perceived stressful nature of this setting, the study identified that non-work stressors had a predominant influence on psychological wellbeing. The identification of the importance of social support from managers aligns with findings from previous studies, with this study differentiating between personal support and work support, and the importance of a manager's work knowledge, availability and visibility.

AB - This thesis describes an action research study assessing the effectiveness of an organisational intervention for work-related stress incorporating participatory principles. The study, set in the call centre business of a UK utilities company, aimed to contribute evidence of the effectiveness of the HSE Management Standards approach in managing work-related stress. The study developed and utilised a two-stage action research framework that guided the research and intervention design and informed the choice of the research methodology. This approach, comprising macro and micro intervention cycles, collected research data at three intervals over the 12-month timeline. The study deployed mixed methods using process evaluation principles with intervention (n=185) and control groups (n=205). The intervention comprised a stress risk assessment based on the Management Standards, delivered to the intervention group through management training. The results showed that the intervention did not reduce employee work-related stress or improve their psychological wellbeing. The process evaluation indicated that the intervention failed to translate an initial change in attitudes, values and knowledge into meaningful changes in psychosocial working conditions. Exposure to non-work stressors was found to be three times more influential on psychological wellbeing than work stressors, with social support from managers having a protective influence on both work-related stress and psychological wellbeing. The study identified the challenges of implementing an organisational intervention for stress in a dynamic, change-affected working environment with high employee turnover, where the inherent nature of the work inhibits the formation of social support networks. Despite the perceived stressful nature of this setting, the study identified that non-work stressors had a predominant influence on psychological wellbeing. The identification of the importance of social support from managers aligns with findings from previous studies, with this study differentiating between personal support and work support, and the importance of a manager's work knowledge, availability and visibility.

KW - MiAaPQ

KW - Management.

KW - Occupational psychology.

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

CY - Lancaster

ER -